I think (was some time ago now) I tried one found in a topic here, and then another from slacky. (Note that I adapted both to make a x86_64 package). Both changed permissions in such a way that I had to reinstall aaa_base to get a functional system again. Seeing that I immediately removed chrome's packages, I was just curious. One day I got curious enough to write my own and motivated long enough to make it work.

I didn't know that slackbuild.org had one, missed that somehow, so my advice now would be to use that one as I'm a happy user of SBo and sbopkg when they have what I need. The .SlackBuild in my repository are only the ones I couldn't find or that I modified.

EDIT: Why I don't use it anymore:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12...dt_on_privacy/ & the fact that it doesn't really satisfy me. For me it lacks polished extensions and the address-bar completion is not as good as firefox's and I use it a lot so it was inconvenient as I had to think before typing something I expected to auto-complete which defeat auto-completion's purpose...
I'm back to firefox (3.6b4)

Please elaborate, or at least provide a link. I have no clue what you're referring to here.

I've pointed out elsewhere why I prefer Firefox and Seamonkey (although Konqueror is a close third):

• Firefox/Seamonkey have a quick way to turn off all styles (View -> Page Styles -> No Styles) which is very useful on pages that don't render well or are just plain ugly.
• I like the fine-grained control over settings (including the user interface) in Firefox/Seamonkey.
• Old habits: I've been using Netscape since it was in .8 beta and the Netscape lineage in Firefox/Seamonkey is comfortable/comforting.
• The intention with Chrome is that updates are pushed automatically to users without much user interaction/control. This runs counter to how I administer my Slackware computers.

Having said all of that Chrome looks like a good browser, and the Windows versions I've played with seem to work pretty well.

Regards,

First create all symbolic links to /usr/lib64 , after reinstall seamonkey, I wished copy only that library, but not it in my hand .

Thanks

[QUOTE=Lufbery;3785494]Please elaborate, or at least provide a link. I have no clue what you're referring to here.

I believe he's talking about a comment implying only criminals care about privacy.

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/12/...For-Wrongdoers

Ah well, that's a silly statement. I get where's he's coming from (sort of) -- I pretty much never do or post something on the Internet that I wouldn't do in public. But I also value my privacy both in the real world and on-line. Some stuff, even most of it, is nobody else's business. :-)