LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2013, 02:53 PM   #1
jessejazza
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
Going Slack!


This is a general query on the Slack (and derivatives).

I'm thinking of making the switch and am unclear why
a] slack and derivatives are so fast (just installed Salix, had a look at Zenwalk a while back).
b] file system why nfs when all the others seem to be ext4
c] Slack would appear to be the better choice as it has wider distribution and larger user base.

I've been a xubuntu user for 6 years and it seems that bugs don't seem to be dealt with which makes me wish to consider another. Debian seems slow on updating apps like Emacs 24 (probably be another 6 months at least before it's available). Fedora seems a bit unstable like *buntu family these days. I thought i'd found what i was looking for in Centos or Scientific Linux except that... there are fine for a server but not really a desktop as one has to use other repos for apps like Abiword, prioritising yum to look in the individual repos for updates - bit dodgy to me it seems and yet they are main distros but i think only for server.

Out of the slack family i don't know which to choose. Arch or Slack as the larger user base would seem a better move but i'd be grateful for advice. As for Salix... perfect install no problems but i don't know if Salix carries out full repo updates etc as it's such a small community. As for Arch i don't know i like what i've read about Pacman... is it possible to use a different package manager.
 
Old 01-30-2013, 04:23 PM   #2
sycamorex
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,412
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951
Your best bet is to try all 3 distros and decide for yourself. My personal opinion is that I don't see any need to use Salix if I can use the "real thing" ie, Slackware. I don't use Arch because.... I prefer Slackware. Arch is a fine distro but I just feel more comfortable with Slackware.

PS1: I don't know what you've read about Pacman
PS2: Sorry If I have misunderstood the last bit of your post but just to be clear: Arch does NOT belong to the Slackware family.
 
Old 01-30-2013, 04:43 PM   #3
jessejazza
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by sycamorex View Post
PS2: Sorry If I have misunderstood the last bit of your post but just to be clear: Arch does NOT belong to the Slackware family.
I thought Arch had the similar packaging.... and so belonged to the Slackware family. I'm just trying to see 'the wood for the trees'. I couldn't believe it when i tried Centos as a desktop... one's got to manually select the 3rd party repo for stuff like Abiword as opposed to server.
 
Old 01-30-2013, 04:55 PM   #4
sycamorex
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,412
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza View Post
I thought Arch had the similar packaging.... and so belonged to the Slackware family. I'm just trying to see 'the wood for the trees'. I couldn't believe it when i tried Centos as a desktop... one's got to manually select the 3rd party repo for stuff like Abiword as opposed to server.
Have a look at this article and the division of Linux distro categories.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._distributions

Yeah, CentOS is predominantly a server distro so it's not optimised for desktop users by default.
 
Old 01-30-2013, 05:37 PM   #5
Didier Spaier
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware-14.0 on a Lenovo T61 6457-4XG
Posts: 3,646

Rep: Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza View Post
b] file system why nfs when all the others seem to be ext4
On Slackware the default is ext4. But you can choose among ext2, ext3, ext4, ReiserFS, JFS and XFS.
 
Old 01-30-2013, 08:16 PM   #6
jessejazza
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didier Spaier View Post
On Slackware the default is ext4. But you can choose among ext2, ext3, ext4, ReiserFS, JFS and XFS.
Why should Salix have chosen nfs? (just wondering that's all) I was surprised i thought virtually all distros chose ext*. I thought it would have something to do with being universal OS like Debian but that's not the case... similar to Slackware.
 
Old 01-30-2013, 08:29 PM   #7
slackass
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: SE Texas
Distribution: Slack64-C ML
Posts: 876

Rep: Reputation: 76
I've used all of the distros you mentioned and I would say that for stability and flexibility Slack is the better choice “for me”.

Salix is a dam good little distro that is in fact completely backwards compatible with Slack. I play with it from time to time but has no advantage over Slack and the last time I played with it you cant log into kde as root which for most people is a non issue but I don't like my distro telling me what I can or can not do.

Arch (I'm guna get flack for this) is stable most of the time but I've had pacman break stuff on an update, and then fix it a few days later. If you have to depend on package with a lot of deps you can bet pacman will screw it up for you from time to time. But as I said pacman will normally fix it again on the next update.

With Slack, your packages are separate from system packages. This is a HUGE plus when something goes wrong because you don't have to depend on a repo to fix it for you. You can chase down the problem yourself and fix it. It's very seldom that a stable update with mess up your packages, I can't remember the last time a stable update borked one of my packages. Mostly your packages will get borked once in awhile when running current.

Try all of them and eventually you'll be running Slack.

Last edited by slackass; 01-30-2013 at 09:58 PM.
 
Old 01-31-2013, 03:03 AM   #8
jessejazza
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackass View Post
Try all of them and eventually you'll be running Slack.
In other words "Go slack... and you'll never go back!"

I do appreciate your replies. My thoughts on smaller distros (as in lower user base) is that release updates may not be as frequent as they should be. At least that has crossed my mind. Having said that the smaller distros like Salix, PCLoS etc often seem to put out a fine release. I did once have a problem when i tried Mint xfce - no updates for a while and then i discovered that the maintainer's wife was seriously ill and he wasn't able to cope with the distro. So i always wonder with the smaller distro cover for illness and unforeseen eventualities. Main distros have enough folk to cope.

Another important reason for considering the KISS family is that one will force oneself to learn more about the OS. I've planned to do a Linux From Scratch or similar but didn't get round to it. So having found an good book last night on Arch
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Arch-Linux-H...9622741&sr=1-1
Good to get hold of and won't break the bank. But will be worth while for the learning exercise.

But having tried Salix i'm certainly going to give Slack a go with a more serious intent of using it in future. Ubuntu and Fedora these days seem to have too many bugs and problems which makes me not want to bother. Ubuntu put Abiword 2.9.2 a buggy development version in the last two releases instead of the stable version 2.8.6.
 
Old 01-31-2013, 04:36 AM   #9
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 6,702
Blog Entries: 51

Rep: Reputation: 1243Reputation: 1243Reputation: 1243Reputation: 1243Reputation: 1243Reputation: 1243Reputation: 1243Reputation: 1243Reputation: 1243
You could try dual-booting Slackware and Arch.
 
Old 01-31-2013, 05:13 AM   #10
Bazzaah
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current, Slackware64 14
Posts: 323

Rep: Reputation: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza View Post
In other words "Go slack... and you'll never go back!"

I do appreciate your replies. My thoughts on smaller distros (as in lower user base) is that release updates may not be as frequent as they should be. At least that has crossed my mind. Having said that the smaller distros like Salix, PCLoS etc often seem to put out a fine release. I did once have a problem when i tried Mint xfce - no updates for a while and then i discovered that the maintainer's wife was seriously ill and he wasn't able to cope with the distro. So i always wonder with the smaller distro cover for illness and unforeseen eventualities. Main distros have enough folk to cope.

Another important reason for considering the KISS family is that one will force oneself to learn more about the OS. I've planned to do a Linux From Scratch or similar but didn't get round to it. So having found an good book last night on Arch
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Arch-Linux-H...9622741&sr=1-1
Good to get hold of and won't break the bank. But will be worth while for the learning exercise.

But having tried Salix i'm certainly going to give Slack a go with a more serious intent of using it in future. Ubuntu and Fedora these days seem to have too many bugs and problems which makes me not want to bother. Ubuntu put Abiword 2.9.2 a buggy development version in the last two releases instead of the stable version 2.8.6.
Slackware is much easier to install than Arch and if you follow the installation and beginners guides on Slackdocs, you'll be up and running in no time. As BrianL suggests you could dual boot. I have Arch but rarely use it - it does run well. The Arch wiki is excellent and should provide you all you need if you go that route. I wouldn't buy a book on using a Linux distro, unless it was to support that distro.
 
Old 01-31-2013, 07:16 AM   #11
BroX
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 733

Rep: Reputation: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza View Post
b] file system why nfs when all the others seem to be ext4
You must be mixing things up, as NFS stands for Network File System [wikipedia.org]
 
Old 01-31-2013, 08:19 AM   #12
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,009

Rep: Reputation: 476Reputation: 476Reputation: 476Reputation: 476Reputation: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza View Post

But having tried Salix i'm certainly going to give Slack a go with a more serious intent of using it in future. Ubuntu and Fedora these days seem to have too many bugs and problems which makes me not want to bother. Ubuntu put Abiword 2.9.2 a buggy development version in the last two releases instead of the stable version 2.8.6.
I predict that you will really like Slackware once you try it. I suggest that you read the book and the ample available support documentation before you install Slackware.
 
Old 02-01-2013, 02:53 AM   #13
jessejazza
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroX View Post
You must be mixing things up, as NFS stands for Network File System [wikipedia.org]
yes i understood that but why are all other distros ext4 (to the best of my knowledge!). It seems Salix chose nfs for some reason... only thin gi can think of that it would be the same as windows (think that's nfs) and so would work perhaps better on a network?

Last edited by jessejazza; 02-01-2013 at 02:55 AM.
 
Old 02-01-2013, 02:58 AM   #14
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,112

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza View Post
yes i understood that but why are all other distros ext4 (to the best of my knowledge!). It seems Salix chose nfs for some reason.
Check again. What you imply is impossible.

And no, it is not true that all distros have chosen ext4 as the filesystem type to install on. Slackware has ext4 as default choice but it is not a mandatory choice.

Eric
 
Old 02-01-2013, 03:06 AM   #15
sycamorex
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,412
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza View Post
yes i understood that but why are all other distros ext4 (to the best of my knowledge!). It seems Salix chose nfs for some reason... only thin gi can think of that it would be the same as windows (think that's nfs) and so would work perhaps better on a network?
You mean XFS, not NFS. One letter and a hell of a difference

Quote:
The default filesystem is now XFS, but as always, users doing a manual install, instead of selecting the autoinstall option, can choose between Btrfs, ext2/3/4, ReiserFS, JFS and XFS filesystems.
http://www.salixos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=4150
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ping from Slack not to Slack ( Usb wireless card Atheros AR9271) andre.it Linux - Networking 1 07-22-2012 02:19 PM
Dual-boot Slack/Ubuntu-install slack over XP-help with weird partition layout & lilo? linus72 Slackware 2 05-23-2009 10:03 AM
Install slack from usb hdd using the slack dvd iso? okos Slackware 6 01-01-2009 02:06 AM
slack 12 is sluggish on a machine that runs slack 11 and earlier perfectly... detpenguin Slackware 10 03-05-2008 09:32 PM
Please recommend Slack-based & Slack-compatible distros. brjoon1021 Slackware 19 11-04-2007 03:14 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration