LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2006, 06:33 AM   #1
jkobrien
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, LFS, Ubuntu, RedHat, Slamd64
Posts: 507

Rep: Reputation: 30
General question on bugs and patches


From the slackware-current ChangeLog:

Quote:
a/etc-11.0-noarch-1.tgz: Fixed a bug in /etc/csh.login that caused repeated
use of "csh -l" to duplicate search directories in the $path. Clearly
/etc/csh.login should set the path just as /etc/profile does.
This bug dates back at at least 1997, maybe earlier, so congratulations to
Dimitar Zhekov for winning this release's "smite the oldest bug" award.
How does this kind of thing work downstream? I don't know if this particular bug is something specific to Slackware, but say that it is a general bug. Would Patrick in that case generally pass on the fix to the package developers?

This question could also go in the LFS forum, as patches are big part of the installation procedure for (B)LFS. I notice that in the (B)LFS books, generally the links for source code are to the webpages of the various packages but the links for patches are to LFS addresses. So are these patches something that the LFS people have created to fix bugs that they themselves have spotted? And presumably they also forward them on to the various projects for inclusion in the next release?

Now that I've typed all that out, it seems obvious that of course they would. I'd like to ask anyway though, to make sure I have it straight.

Thanks,

John
 
Old 09-28-2006, 09:33 AM   #2
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,766

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
Most patches are distribution-specific and only change configuration files or build-configuration files.
Patches that fix a bug in source code are usually passed on upstream.
 
Old 09-28-2006, 03:54 PM   #3
jkobrien
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, LFS, Ubuntu, RedHat, Slamd64
Posts: 507

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Ah, I see. Thanks a lot for clarifying that.

John
 
  


Reply

Tags
patches


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
general question Nikosis Linux - General 2 05-28-2006 01:03 PM
General OS question, newb question ty13 General 14 04-11-2006 08:21 PM
Question about updating noncrit/critical patches davidtcw Linux - Newbie 1 03-31-2006 04:02 AM
RedHat patches vs open source patches paulsh2k4 Linux - Software 1 10-14-2004 03:18 AM
A general question, don't know what to do now. schatoor Linux - General 5 11-26-2002 09:30 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration