SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I too will be leaving the Linux/Slackware community after almost 2 years. The only reason I came to Slackware was MLED. Since its gone, I don't have a reason to continue my endeavor. Some people think having to do everything manually is the way to go. The way technology is evolving, its minimizing the procedures/steps to get a system updating and running. People are always saying how unique Linux is as a server. But, the same server has hundreds of millions Windows/Macs connecting to it and not hundred of millions Linux desktops/laptops connecting to it. The same people who feel that way, don't assemble their cars, microwaves, build their houses from the ground-up etc.... Most Linux users do have a one-direction attitude. Its bigger than Linux, Microsoft and Macs. I will be testing Neverware/Cloudready for a week or so and I'm back to Windows until Linux catch up. I enjoyed it while it lasted. Thanks for the little knowledge you guys gave. Best wishes.
Last edited by PROBLEMCHYLD; 07-29-2017 at 08:45 PM.
I too will be leaving the Linux/Slackware community after almost 2 years. The only reason I came to Slackware was MLED. Since its gone, I don't have a reason to continue my endeavor. Some people think having to do everything manually is the way to go. The way technology is evolving, its minimizing the procedures/steps to get a system updating and running. People are always saying how unique Linux is as a server. But, the same server has hundreds of millions Windows/Macs connecting to it and not hundred of millions Linux desktops/laptops connecting to it. The same people who feel that way, don't assemble their cars, microwaves, build their houses from the ground-up etc.... Most Linux users do have a one-direction attitude. Its bigger than Linux, Microsoft and Macs. I will be testing Neverware/Cloudready for a week or so and I'm back to Windows until Linux catch up. I enjoyed it while it lasted. Thanks for the little knowledge you guys gave. Best wishes.
Take care man! I have a question though what exactly are the critical components that you require and feel are difficult to get working and updated? I toyed with a small home server before, but I pretty much use my computer as a workstation and desktop.
Some people think having to do everything manually is the way to go. The way technology is evolving, its minimizing the procedures/steps to get a system updating and running.
Feel free to fork the project. Frankly, I'd be glad if someone took care of it, and technically you seem up to the task.
IMO that's what went wrong with MLED. No use of scalable tools.
Let me use a cooking metaphor to elaborate a bit. A friend of mine works as a chef at our local school. Which, by the way, has the best food I have ever seen in a canteen. A few years ago she gave me cooking lessons in exchange for computer lessons. For the most part, the vegetables she uses either come homegrown from the schools' garden, or from the local organic farmer. But for some ingredients like spinach, she does make an exception and uses deep-frozen spinach, not spinach leaves. She explained to me that cooking spinach starting from the leaves, cleaning them, cutting them, cooking them etc. is much work, so she uses deep-frozen spinach, as this is much less work, with an almost identical end result.
Moving to CentOS means accepting to use some ingredients that are much easier and faster to cook, but I still know how to do things by hand. I get rid of NetworkManager and edit scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts by hand, much as I would do with /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1.conf. Similarly, I uninstall firewalld and use my own iptables script instead. I know how to build my own RPM packages, but so far, this skill wasn't needed, since I always found some well-tendered third-party repository. I know how to build a mail server from scratch, with Postfix, Dovecot and Postgrey built from source, but now I just prefer doing 'yum install postfix dovecot postgrey' and being up and running in no time, without the hassle of rebuilding components whenever there's a security fix but simple doing 'yum update'. Also, knowing that my two main servers are officially supported with low-risk security updates until June 2024 is great.
Let me use a cooking metaphor to elaborate a bit. A friend of mine works as a chef at our local school. Which, by the way, has the best food I have ever seen in a canteen. A few years ago she gave me cooking lessons in exchange for computer lessons. For the most part, the vegetables she uses either come homegrown from the schools' garden, or from the local organic farmer. But for some ingredients like spinach, she does make an exception and uses deep-frozen spinach, not spinach leaves. She explained to me that cooking spinach starting from the leaves, cleaning them, cutting them, cooking them etc. is much work, so she uses deep-frozen spinach, as this is much less work, with an almost identical end result.
Moving to CentOS means accepting to use some ingredients that are much easier and faster to cook, but I still know how to do things by hand. I get rid of NetworkManager and edit scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts by hand, much as I would do with /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1.conf. Similarly, I uninstall firewalld and use my own iptables script instead. I know how to build my own RPM packages, but so far, this skill wasn't needed, since I always found some well-tendered third-party repository. I know how to build a mail server from scratch, with Postfix, Dovecot and Postgrey built from source, but now I just prefer doing 'yum install postfix dovecot postgrey' and being up and running in no time, without the hassle of rebuilding components whenever there's a security fix but simple doing 'yum update'. Also, knowing that my two main servers are officially supported with low-risk security updates until June 2024 is great.
Niki
kikinovak --
Thank you for all your contributions to the Slackware LQ forum ( not to mention MLED and your contributions to SBo ).
Curious ... are you going with CentOS 7 ( including systemd ) or will you stay with CentOS 6 and wish for a marketing miracle ?
I agree with your assessment of running CentOS as a server -- disable NetworkManager and edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* 'by hand ; stay with rpm binary installs whenever possible.
Maybe Slackware needs yet another package management tool, maybe called slum which works much like yum on CentOS to install prebuilt packages and dependencies ?
Curious ... are you going with CentOS 7 ( including systemd ) or will you stay with CentOS 6 and wish for a marketing miracle ?
I'm going with CentOS 7. I simply learnt how to work with systemd, and it works, without drama, like everything in CentOS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjhambrick
Maybe Slackware needs yet another package management tool, maybe called slum which works much like yum on CentOS to install prebuilt packages and dependencies ?
If I won the lottery and became a billionaire overnight, I guess I would happily put together a team to compile and maintain my "perfect" Linux distribution, a blend of Slackware and RHEL. RPM-based with a dependency resolver, BSD init, newbie-friendly like Ubuntu but with Slackware's clean configuration scripts under the hood instead of Ubuntu's mess. I'd call this Yatahongaga Linux, "Yatahongaga" being an ancient pataphysician word meaning nothing in particular.
reading this post is like a deja vu. Didn't you announce something similar couple of years ago?
Quote:
Let me use a cooking metaphor to elaborate a bit.
I think I get it: using Slackware as a base is too much effort. So it boils down to the amount of work you need to put. This is a perfectly understandable and reasonable decision. Sometimes I actually consider switching to Debian, when the amount of SlackBuilds I maintain begins to feel as too much work. However, it seems to me that if everyone thought this way, projects like SlackBuilds.org would not exist
Please, do not interpret my words as any sort of criticism against you. I have always had a good opinion of you and your work. I wish you all the best.
Last edited by solarfields; 07-11-2017 at 07:29 AM.
I don't want to be pushy, but slackrepo exists exactly for that kind of setup, and then there's a huge amount of tools like Slackware Live and takeover.sh and packer and vagrant and ansible and salt etc etc for managing fleets of servers.
No need for drama. Lots of us use multiple operating systems. Move on. The people I feel sorry for are those attached to MLED. But business is business and time is money.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.