LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-09-2008, 10:27 PM   #16
astrogeek
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]X{.0|.1|.2|-current} ::X>=12<=14, FreeBSD_10{.0|.1}
Posts: 2,135

Rep: Reputation: 844Reputation: 844Reputation: 844Reputation: 844Reputation: 844Reputation: 844Reputation: 844
I remember Walnut Creek!


As I type this I have my Walnut Creek 4-Disc set of Slackware 96 (3.1) in my hands, which makes it difficult to type!

Complete with FREE 36 page installation guide and unused product registration card! Floppyless installation to boot! (pun intended...)

I also have the 4-Disc Slackware 4.0 distribution from InfoMagic of Flagstaff, AZ - ever heard of them?

I started with Linux in '95 while on a project site converting a large telecommunications site for use as a radio-telescope. One of the other engineers on site was from a Unix background and all the software development was done in that environment. I needed something other than my M$ underpowered monochrome laptop to effectively integrate my efforts with theirs and he introduced me to this new realm of FREEDOM software and gave me all the tools I needed! Revolutionary!

I ordered a new 120MHZ Sharp laptop from Computer Shopper and spent several evenings in my hotel room learning to install this Linux thing... the rest is history!

Ah... brings back memories...
 
Old 10-10-2008, 07:25 AM   #17
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 89
Slackware 96 was my first Slackware...

But I was actually introduced to the *IX world by a co-worker who had installed MINIX on his 386 system and let me dial-in to play with it.
That was before we heard of Linus...
 
Old 10-10-2008, 08:15 AM   #18
Lufbery
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Distribution: Slackware 64 14.0
Posts: 1,142
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
Hi Niels,

So how did Slackware 3.5 run for you? Could you still do some useful work with it, or have the different software versions moved on too much? Was it quicker than 12.1?

Regards,

-Drew
 
Old 10-10-2008, 08:56 AM   #19
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 89
Quote:
So how did Slackware 3.5 run for you?
It is working flawlessly, but I am not doing any serious work with it.
Networking is fine, X is working 100%, pine worked, lynx worked, did some telnet from this machine and to this machine...
It uses the 2.0.34 kernel so no modern hardware is supported.

'top' shows it's 99,9% idle on my machine (VMware on a P4 2MHz box).
It uses just 15M from the 64M I configured.

It does run X, but don't forget that fvwm2 is my windows-manager (and it comes with twm, olvwm and fvwm95 )
Netscape was the default browser in X, but it didn't work for me... The old clock and calculator from X worked fine.

It is fast - booting and running... But then it loads almost no modules at all.
The 'full' install took up about 400M of harddisk space only.

About it being 'useful': For me it is just for fun and to study how Slackware has changed over the years
 
Old 10-10-2008, 10:19 AM   #20
Lufbery
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Distribution: Slackware 64 14.0
Posts: 1,142
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
Niels,

Thanks for the insight. I too was curious about how Slackware has changed over the years. It seems as though it hasn't changed much -- a lot of people are still using Pine, Lynx, and telnet -- oh, and a Netscape-based browser.

Regards,

-Drew
 
Old 10-10-2008, 12:30 PM   #21
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 89
Quote:
a lot of people are still using Pine, Lynx, and telnet -- oh, and a Netscape-based browser.
Me too... I still boot in runlevel 3 and start X by hand if & when I want to. Old habits never die

Pine became alpine, telnet became ssh and I use links more than lynx now but most of the commands are the same.

If I find some time during the weekend I might write a page on my blog with some captured screens.
 
Old 10-10-2008, 04:18 PM   #22
MQMan
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Slack64 13.37
Posts: 536

Rep: Reputation: 36
Geez. This brings back memories. My introduction to Slackware, was the 3.0 disk contained in the Linux Unleashed book. And I've been running it ever since.

And I've never set it up to boot into anything but a console.

Looking though my CD draw, I can find official copies of 3.4, 3.6, 9.0, 9.1 (2 copies!!), 10.0, 10.1, 10.2, 11.0, 12.0, and 12.1.

Cheers.

Last edited by MQMan; 10-13-2008 at 09:11 PM.
 
Old 10-11-2008, 06:41 AM   #23
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 89
For the curious, I put some screenshots of my Slackware 3.5 installation on my blog...

I'll try to capture some nice screens running X as well and put them there.
 
Old 10-11-2008, 11:39 AM   #24
chexmix
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Arlington, MA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, OpenBSD
Posts: 212
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 17
Whew, I'm a newbie. I vividly remember going to CompUSA in Manhattan in 1999 (I think ...) to pick out my first Linux distro. Typically for me I was having a tough time deciding, so my then-wife held my two choices (whatever version of Caldera was current at the time and Slackware 4.0) behind her back and made me choose left or right ...

... I still celebrate the fact that the choice worked out so well.
 
Old 10-12-2008, 06:57 AM   #25
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,135
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Mmmm, think I'll try one of those early Slackwares with Qemu, I've got that already. Possible? Or maybe get VMWare player?
 
Old 10-12-2008, 08:36 AM   #26
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 89
I never used Qemu, so I can't help you here.

At work we use the professional version of VMware, so for convenience I use the free VMware server as home.
It allows you to install several virtual machines, run them simultaneously (if you have enough memory and CPU power) etc.
I still use version 1.0.7, not the newer version 2, as it requires PAM to be installed - but there are some other threads in this forum about his.

By the way... I managed to install Slackware 1.1.2 in VMware as well. But without network or CDRom support. I had never seen the 0.99 kernel before
 
Old 10-12-2008, 08:56 AM   #27
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,135
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I'm going to try it with Qemu now, using Eric's article on Qemu as guidance. Fingers (and everything else) crossed.
 
Old 10-12-2008, 09:17 AM   #28
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 89
ok, do tell me the results.
VMware is a fantastic product, but it is not open software and does have some problems as you can see browsing on this forum.
 
Old 10-12-2008, 10:05 AM   #29
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,135
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well...installation went OK, not much about that has changed. Adduser went OK. Then when I ran startx, I ran into a problem: a message something like "xorg had not been configured". I thought there might be problems because I did a full install, and when it got to all the x stuff (vesa, etc), for every one it said it was setting that as default (sorry, this is all vague without correct details). I'll have to do more reading. Interesting experience.
 
Old 10-12-2008, 10:31 AM   #30
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 89
brianL:
Which version exactly are you installing?

I got X working on 3.5 and just now finished Slackware 1.1.2 - with X and fvwm
It did take some head-scratching to find out how to configure it, but in the end it worked.

Oh, how things are simpler now...

In a few moments I'll put a screenshot of my 1.1.2 installation on my blog.

By the way... 1.1.2 is slooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww..........
Something else I noticed: 3.5 works fine and almost uses no CPU power, but 1.1.2 leaves my host system with 99% CPU utilization. Almost seems like running DOS! Probably something in the 0.99 kernel...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware hangs after fresh install z31200n3 Slackware 11 04-11-2007 09:08 PM
Fresh Slackware 10.2 install... JesusFreak84 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 3 12-11-2005 04:09 PM
Fresh install of Slackware will not load X whited Linux - Hardware 4 06-04-2005 04:16 PM
No sound on a fresh Slackware install tanaselia Slackware - Installation 16 05-16-2005 01:25 PM
Getting 2.6.7 with slackware on a fresh install equilibrium Slackware 6 07-13-2004 05:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration