LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-02-2002, 11:14 AM   #1
biosx
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Distribution: Gentoo, Ubuntu
Posts: 63

Rep: Reputation: 15
Framebuffer problem with 2.4.20 kernel


Hey all, long time. Just recompiled with 2.4.20 kernel. Updated NVIDIA drivers, PCMCIA (its a laptop), and my linux-wlan. Anyway, I noticed that there wasn't a menu config option for a framebuffer in the console drivers section. I enabled everything in the console drivers section anyway (VGA Console and Video Selection).

Now to the problem.

I have LILO configured for the framebuffer @ 1024x768 (256) but the resolution is irrelevant. Every time I reboot with the new kernel the framebuffer doesn't work. I just get a blank, black screen as the system boots. Nothing is halted, it is just that I get no image on the screen. I tried changing the resolution and color depth but the same thing happens.

Has anybody gotten framebuffer support working in 2.4.20?

Hardware specs:
P4 1.6 - 256 DDR - Geforce 2 Go - Laptop Display (max @ 1024x768)

Thanks
 
Old 12-02-2002, 01:15 PM   #2
LNXman
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: California (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 97

Rep: Reputation: 15
You have probably enabled experimental frame buffers when you enabled all. Not a good idea if you ask me. Especially if it is experimental. Anyways, you are going to have to re-compile your kernel and do not enable the experimental fb drivers for high end cards (i.e. ATI, MATROX, NVIDIA, 3DFX, etc) and only keep low end drivers like vesa (default) and vga. Don't be tempted to use the NVidia frame buffer because you will be running into problems when XFree86 loads its NVidia drivers.

GL
 
Old 12-02-2002, 06:55 PM   #3
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,398

Rep: Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964Reputation: 1964
framebuffer has been "experimental" for aaaaaaaaaaaaaaages huh? you'd think that they'd accept it was working now..!
 
Old 12-02-2002, 07:50 PM   #4
LNXman
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: California (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 97

Rep: Reputation: 15
I figured the kernel tree maintainers would just get rid of them after a while, since they were included (mostly) for non-gui systems (small population target), such that you can still have most of the features of your popular video card within your vt consoles. However, I did not understand the theory behind it since real servers don't have high-end cards built in them and everyone else uses gui.

Besides, the idea for high-end fbs never caught on. An indicator is the last development date for those high-end cards listed. The fact is that most users would rather use the gui drivers, and would never have a need for them. Most end-users just fail to understand the purpose for those buffers (unless they are curious and compile them in their kernel -- an example is this post ). Thus learning about them the "curious-george" way. .

Probably they will be removed when version 2.6.X is released. . .
 
Old 12-02-2002, 08:21 PM   #5
neo77777
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Distribution: *NIX
Posts: 3,704

Rep: Reputation: 55
How about Console Drivers->Frame buffer when you select Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers in Code maturity level options?
I have 2.4.20 with frame buffer support going on my slack install, none of a problem. Well, yes frame buffer was there for ages, and as I can understand it migrated from UNIX where there weren't any sofisticated video hardware at the times and luck of drivers.
 
Old 12-02-2002, 09:21 PM   #6
moses
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Arizona, US, Earth
Distribution: Slackware, (Non-Linux: Solaris 7,8,9; OSX; BeOS)
Posts: 1,152

Rep: Reputation: 46
Build your framebuffers as modules, and only load the one you
need.
I've got 2.4.20 on an experimental machine, and FBs work. Well,
the radeon one works. . .
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kernel 2.6.11.11 and FrameBuffer... Cybers19 Debian 4 01-25-2006 03:41 AM
kernel framebuffer m_yates Debian 2 03-11-2005 02:33 AM
VESA framebuffer vs Intel framebuffer in Slackware 10.0 with default kernel brancalessio Slackware 3 01-20-2005 03:21 PM
need help with framebuffer in 2.6.7 kernel SciYro Linux - Newbie 0 12-07-2004 08:44 AM
[recompiled kernel] framebuffer problem and some more jacktheripper Slackware 2 01-10-2004 12:42 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration