LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2010, 08:02 AM   #16
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203

Quote:
Originally Posted by siawash View Post
Let me first of all apologize for my oversight. The dependencies were clearly mentioned on the slackbuild site.

I am not sure whether these dependencies can work post chrome installation or do I need to uninstall chrome and start afresh.?

I found GConf on the slackbuild site but not seamonkey-solibs. And I am not sure if they should be installed in any sequence.?

I did find seamonkey-solibs on slackware.com

ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackwar...3-x86_64-1.txz

I am guessing I can install it using

installpkg
For most slackbuilds the order is vital as the script won't build the package if dependencies aren't met usually (assuming no hand-tuning). For the google-chrome slackbuild it won't matter I don't think since the script is just repackaging a .deb binary package to a slackware friendly format and then installing it. If I remember right I missed the seamonkey dependency on my multilib system and installed it post chrome. On the other hand since you have a google-chrome package unless you deleted it, probably sitting in /tmp somewhere you can just removepkg google-chrome and then reinstall it after the seamonkey dependency.
 
Old 04-30-2010, 08:13 AM   #17
siawash
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Zorin 6
Posts: 589

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Well, i am using slackware 13 but felt current would be the source closest to my platform. I certainly did not see were slackware 13 seamonkey can be sourced.

Actually I would prefer to install the minimal seamonkey-solibs ?
 
Old 04-30-2010, 08:17 AM   #18
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by siawash View Post
Well, i am using slackware 13 but felt current would be the source closest to my platform. I certainly did not see were slackware 13 seamonkey can be sourced.

Actually I would prefer to install the minimal seamonkey-solibs ?
32 bit seamonkey solibs

64 bit seamonkey solibs

It's in the patches directory of slackware13.
 
Old 04-30-2010, 08:53 AM   #19
siawash
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Zorin 6
Posts: 589

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
OK I managed to install the seamonkey solibs but running into problems installing GConf.

Code:
checking if g++ PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes
checking if g++ static flag -static works... yes
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes
checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/x86_64-slackware-linux/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64) supports shared libraries... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking for glib-genmarshal... /usr/bin/glib-genmarshal
FYI:  Will build without *any* debugging code
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking whether to build gtk-doc documentation... no
checking for gtkdoc-check... /usr/bin/gtkdoc-check
checking for DEPENDENT... configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 > 2.14.0 gmodule-2.0 >= 2.7.0 gobject-2.0 >= 2.7.0 ORBit-2.0 >= 2.4.0 dbus-1 >= 1.0.0 dbus-glib-1 >= 0.74) were not met:

No package 'ORBit-2.0' found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables DEPENDENT_CFLAGS
and DEPENDENT_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.
I only need ORBit-2.0, right? Can that be found on slackbuilds?
 
Old 04-30-2010, 11:04 AM   #20
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
Yes, but read the slackbuild page to see if IT has dependencies.
 
Old 05-03-2010, 09:36 AM   #21
siawash
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Zorin 6
Posts: 589

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Hello all, just updating you on google chrome installation. I started from scratch by rebuilding slackware. I then successfully installed orbit requiring no other dependencies followed by 64 bit seamonkey solibs. Then chrome itself. Followed by all the other desired packages.

updated the system. Unfortunately exactly as before google would not launch. It now requires

Code:
root@redeemer:/home/siawacsh# google-chrome
/usr/bin/google-chrome: error while loading shared libraries: libnssutil3.so.1d: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
root@redeemer:/home/siawacsh# google-chrome
/usr/bin/google-chrome: error while loading shared libraries: libnssutil3.so.1d: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I am thinking why are these dependencies not listed clearly on the slackbuild site. I might have to rebuild google again...

Last edited by siawash; 05-03-2010 at 09:38 AM.
 
Old 05-03-2010, 10:11 AM   #22
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by siawash View Post
Code:
root@redeemer:/home/siawacsh# google-chrome
/usr/bin/google-chrome: error while loading shared libraries: libnssutil3.so.1d: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I am thinking why are these dependencies not listed clearly on the slackbuild site. I might have to rebuild google again...
If you do not install Slackware in full, then it will be your own responsibility to fill the gaps where they appear. Dependency information on slackbuilds.org will never contain packages that are already in Slackware.

The missing file "libnssutil3.so" is part of the "seamonkey-solibs" package. Which is part of Slackware itself, you'll find it in the "l/" directory.

Eric
 
Old 05-03-2010, 10:45 AM   #23
siawash
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Zorin 6
Posts: 589

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
If you do not install Slackware in full, then it will be your own responsibility to fill the gaps where they appear. Dependency information on slackbuilds.org will never contain packages that are already in Slackware.

The missing file "libnssutil3.so" is part of the "seamonkey-solibs" package. Which is part of Slackware itself, you'll find it in the "l/" directory.

Eric

Hi Allien_Bob, would care to be a bit more clearer. When I was rebuilding Slackware I took care to go for the default option of installing everything.

So, you saying is on the installation CD...???
If so, would please give me the command which would install that from the cd?


I certainly don't see a "l/ " directory. Perhaps you meant to / (root) but I used the whereis command to search for it without any results. Am correct in thinking that chrome has to be removed before this procedure?
Thanks in advance.
 
Old 05-03-2010, 12:02 PM   #24
dolphin77
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Odesa, Ukraine
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 206

Rep: Reputation: 60
In install cd you have slackware or slackware64 dir which have subdirs of groups of packages. Subdir l goes for libs. There it should be.

Last edited by dolphin77; 05-03-2010 at 12:04 PM.
 
Old 05-03-2010, 12:13 PM   #25
siawash
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Zorin 6
Posts: 589

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Thanks dolphin77. I found the directory in question. Can you show me the command to use?

Would it be something on the lines of script?

./libnssutil3.so...?
 
Old 05-03-2010, 09:50 PM   #26
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
Code:
cd /opt/google/chrome
ls -l
Look to see what libnssutil3.so.1d is linked to. Chrome uses several links to seamonkey by default. Firefox has the same files so you can relink these, or if you don't want Seamonkey at all you can probably get by with creating a symlink to point everything to firefox. This has worked for me when there were missing seamonkey packages.

I must note here, that when I installed 32 bit google-chrome on my multilib-current system recently I had to install an entire 32 bit seamonkey to get working SSL in google-chrome.
 
Old 05-04-2010, 05:07 AM   #27
siawash
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Zorin 6
Posts: 589

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by damgar View Post
Code:
cd /opt/google/chrome
ls -l
Look to see what libnssutil3.so.1d is linked to. Chrome uses several links to seamonkey by default. Firefox has the same files so you can relink these, or if you don't want Seamonkey at all you can probably get by with creating a symlink to point everything to firefox. This has worked for me when there were missing seamonkey packages.

I must note here, that when I installed 32 bit google-chrome on my multilib-current system recently I had to install an entire 32 bit seamonkey to get working SSL in google-chrome.

It does not look to be linked to anything. I am assuming >> indicates a link.

Code:
 cd /opt/google/chrome
siawacsh@redeemer:/opt/google/chrome$ ls
chrome*                libnssutil3.so.1d@    product_logo_256.png
chrome-sandbox*        libplc4.so.0d@        product_logo_32.png
chrome.pak             libplds4.so.0d@       product_logo_32.xpm
default-app-block      libsmime3.so.1d@      product_logo_48.png
google-chrome*         locales/              product_logo_64.png
google-chrome.desktop  product_logo_128.png  resources/
libffmpegsumo.so       product_logo_16.png   xdg-settings*
libnspr4.so.0d@        product_logo_22.png
libnss3.so.1d@         product_logo_24.png
 
Old 05-04-2010, 05:12 AM   #28
siawash
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Zorin 6
Posts: 589

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
In any case I have flash working on firefox after the slackware rebuild. This brings me back to the issue of stability. I cannot getaway from idea that when we talk about slackware stability it must only relate to the base system. I.e. you don't watch movies online, don't require the latest office apps...etc
 
Old 05-04-2010, 07:42 AM   #29
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
I have 4 slack systems and all of them work just fine to watch DVD's, youtube, hulu.com. My only complaint comes from flash's 64 bit support which lags WAY behind on 32 bit in my experience. With multilib I have no problems. As far as installing flash player I don't bother with a slackbuild since it's a single file being extracted and copied to the appropriate location.

EDIT: as mentioned
Code:
dtest@dtest:~$ ls -lt /opt/google/chrome/
total 50868
drwx------ 2 root root     4096 2010-04-30 19:36 extensions/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root       30 2010-04-30 19:36 libnspr4.so.0d -> /usr/lib/seamonkey/libnspr4.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root       29 2010-04-30 19:36 libnss3.so.1d -> /usr/lib/seamonkey/libnss3.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root       33 2010-04-30 19:36 libnssutil3.so.1d -> /usr/lib/seamonkey/libnssutil3.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root       29 2010-04-30 19:36 libplc4.so.0d -> /usr/lib/seamonkey/libplc4.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root       30 2010-04-30 19:36 libplds4.so.0d -> /usr/lib/seamonkey/libplds4.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root       31 2010-04-30 19:36 libsmime3.so.1d -> /usr/lib/seamonkey/libsmime3.so*
not
Code:
ls
If you didn't install the seamonkey solibs again then you didn't have nssutil3.so. It wasn't included in slack13 by default, and thus is in the "patches" directory from a slackware download mirror.

Last edited by damgar; 05-04-2010 at 07:57 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] flash player installation problem shariefbe Linux - Newbie 6 12-26-2009 01:39 PM
Flash Player 10 - problem installing mumof2littleangels Linux - Newbie 2 10-15-2009 09:50 AM
a problem trying to download flash player 9 different thoughts Linux - Desktop 6 01-27-2007 05:12 AM
About flash player problem nigaocuomei Fedora 3 01-06-2007 12:50 AM
some problem whit flash player tajo01 Debian 1 04-28-2006 08:28 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration