SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i currently have slack 14 on a vm (virtualbox), firefox22 from current runs fine.
edit: as i now looked at the bug link ive seen "x86_64".. so ff21 crashes on slack 14 64bit?! i run 32bit on my vm and plan to run 32bit if i get slack installed on my routerbox. could be a 64bit compile problem?
Last edited by Stuferus; 07-01-2013 at 01:01 PM.
Reason: added detail/question
Going with the ESR branch for -stable is a sane choice and fully support that. Although this decision should have been made as Firefox 17 was the most current version.
I also don't know if this will help, but when I saw the changelog I did download Firefox 22 directly from the Firefox site. I am running a stock Slackware 14 system on my laptop and I am using KDE. I removed the mozilla-firefox package and extracted the Firefox download. It is running just fine, no crashes (at least not yet).
Regardless of that, I do see that the ESR version probably more closely aligns with Slackware's philosophy. I have a need/desire to stay on the latest versions, but I can easily deal with that myself.
If you're on Slackware 14.0, you can grab the packages from my dropbox folder (give them a few minutes to upload).
Thank you, but I would prefer a methodic way
The only solution I found was to compile Firefox 21.0 using Slackware 14's SlackBuild and generate a slackware package.
If anyone is interested to "down-upgrade" from 17.0esr to 21.0, you can download the slackbuilds from here (if you don't have it in your slackware tree):
Now you only have to run the mozilla-firefox.SlackBuild script...
I heard that building Firefox is long and complicated. It has scared me off trying to do it myself. How long did your build take (machine specs too, if poss.)?
The only solution I found was to compile Firefox 21.0 using Slackware 14's SlackBuild and generate a slackware package.
If anyone is interested to "down-upgrade" from 17.0esr to 21.0, you can download the slackbuilds from here (if you don't have it in your slackware tree):
I use Slackware 14.0. I don't use KDE often but I have 4.10.1 installed. I made a 22.0 package using the old build script and premade Firefox binary package. 22.0 runs fine for me.
I use Slackware 14.0. I don't use KDE often but I have 4.10.1 installed. I made a 22.0 package using the old build script and premade Firefox binary package. 22.0 runs fine for me.
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 (started with 13.37). Testing -current in a spare partition.
Posts: 928
Rep:
I'm already using Firefox and Thunderbird ESR since January.
There is no big difference, just some interface improvements.
I like the new "Downloads" window from Main Release, in ESR we have the old one,
but the main release number version is amazing, at Christmas it must be 30 or more
I heard that building Firefox is long and complicated. It has scared me off trying to do it myself. How long did your build take (machine specs too, if poss.)?
You are right!
I compiled in a Intel Core 2 Quad 2.40GHz, 4GB RAM. The first time I tried it was taking more than 2 hours with full ram + 1GB of swap! I aborted it, and modified the slackbuild script to use "make -j 4" to compile in parallel. It took "only" 54 minutes using ~ 3GB ram.
(BTW, is there a better way to make a slackbuild compile in parallel?)
with SlackBuilds.org scripts generally passing MAKEFLAGS (like MAKEFLAGS=" -j8 ") works, but the official slackbuilds in Slackware use NUMJOBS in the same way.
BTW, in some of them it's explicitly disabled (because not supported).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.