LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-18-2005, 03:01 PM   #1
chbin
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: slackware-current
Posts: 379

Rep: Reputation: 31
File Managers?


This question is for all the slackers that don't use kde or gnome. What file managers are all you using. I'm usually running fluxbox, xfce, or any other light one, and want to find an awesome file manager for it that I can use for them all, depending on what one I start up that particular day.

I don't have kde or gnome installed on my box, so using konqerour or nautiles it out. I don't want to use them anyway.

I would like to find a file manager that has a "preview feature" of file content. A tabbed one would be nice.
 
Old 03-18-2005, 03:31 PM   #2
zanku
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Gentoo&Slackware
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Well I'm using Gentoo filebrowser, no Kde or Gnome just Fluxbox.
I like Gentoo filebrowser because you can add new buttons and make it open diffrent programs for diffrent stuff. It is really ugly but you download a nice gtk1 theme and it's perfect.
 
Old 03-18-2005, 03:39 PM   #3
gbhil
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: /dev/input/chair0
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo, Vector, Roll-your-own-with-GNU binutils
Posts: 174

Rep: Reputation: 30
emelfm is a great dual pane file manager
xffm gets my vote for a "konqueror" style file explorer
 
Old 03-18-2005, 04:55 PM   #4
Okie
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 964

Rep: Reputation: 34
i agree with zanku gentoo file browser is good, also mc in a terminal is good, rox is another good one too, there are lots of choices even without Gnome or KDE...
 
Old 03-18-2005, 05:01 PM   #5
AxeZ
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Novi Sad, Vojvodina
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 386

Rep: Reputation: 32
midnight commander...it's unbeatable..
 
Old 03-18-2005, 05:12 PM   #6
chbin
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: slackware-current
Posts: 379

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31
gentoo is ugly as hell. mc is even worse. If I want a mostly "text" file manager, I woulld just use a shell, which most of the time I do. But there are times that a pretty file manager with some features would be nice. I'm not willing to use KDE, or Gnome. I like fluxbox and the light stuff.

I want a pretty one with some features. Preview pictures, text files, and such. Tabed browsing.
 
Old 03-18-2005, 05:22 PM   #7
chbin
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: slackware-current
Posts: 379

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31
Running a full blown desktop is not for me. Don't need it, but having a really nice file manager run in one of my small window managers would be nice.

I've used Konquerer before and it's a bit to much. It aslo a web browser like explorer which I don't need. It's a bit to microsoft for me. I have firefox to surf. One feature it has that is nice though is the ability to position the mouse curser over it and see a preview of the file. Great for checking out my /etc files really quick.

Nautilus just sucks. It has no feature at all.
 
Old 03-18-2005, 05:57 PM   #8
dhave
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: still outside the Matrix
Distribution: Arch, formerly Gentoo and Slackware
Posts: 438

Rep: Reputation: 31
Well, you could try pathfinder. It's part of the fox toolkit. If you don't want to compile from source, go to www.linuxpackages.net and search for "fox" under your Slackware version. The current version there is 1.4.7, I believe. Install it, then run pathfinder by going to /fox-1.4.7/pathfinder and running PathFinder.

It's fast for what it does. Nice-looking, got a preview feature, etc. It doesn't do dual panels, however.

Also, Roxfiler is really a very nifty filemanager, though it takes a couple of hours to get used to the way it works. It's very fast, and I think it has most if not all of the features you mention. I think linuxpackages.net has a rox package, too, or you can compile it from source.
 
Old 03-18-2005, 11:15 PM   #9
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,752

Rep: Reputation: 463Reputation: 463Reputation: 463Reputation: 463Reputation: 463
ROX-Filer is a great file manager -probably doesn't have all tghe features you want -but it has features you hadn't imagined. ROX will make your work MUCH easier and faster!
 
Old 03-18-2005, 11:25 PM   #10
gbonvehi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Argentina (SR, LP)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,145

Rep: Reputation: 51
You could try: http://tuxcmd.sourceforge.net/
I never used it but it seems to fill your tastes.

Last edited by gbonvehi; 03-18-2005 at 11:26 PM.
 
Old 03-19-2005, 02:26 AM   #11
dhave
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: still outside the Matrix
Distribution: Arch, formerly Gentoo and Slackware
Posts: 438

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally posted by gbonvehi
You could try: http://tuxcmd.sourceforge.net/
I never used it but it seems to fill your tastes.
Yeah, I forgot about tux commander. It's fast and good-looking.

But do give Roxfiler a spin. It's a different approach to file management that you may want at least to sample before going with the norm. I use Roxfiler for most things just because I think the interface is so cool, but I keep a fast panel manager like mc close at hand for quick stuff.

If you try Rox, keep it on your system for a couple of days. You might not like it right away, but nearly everyone who sticks with it more than a few hours really likes it.

Last edited by dhave; 03-19-2005 at 02:29 AM.
 
Old 03-19-2005, 03:43 AM   #12
xgreen
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Slackware,Ubuntu
Posts: 389

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by gbonvehi
You could try: http://tuxcmd.sourceforge.net/
I never used it but it seems to fill your tastes.
hah... i've to try this one.....
 
Old 03-19-2005, 06:50 PM   #13
JohnKFT
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: NW Scotland
Distribution: Slackware 10
Posts: 169

Rep: Reputation: 30
Rox with Icewm makes Gnome and KDE seem like wading through treacle. Rox sounds like the nearest to what you are after. Lightning fast and simple but with Gnome-type panels, icons on the desktop, set the background and thumbnails for virtually anything remotely resembling a picture, including videos. You should definitely try it.

PS In the terminal I use vfu - similar to mc but way smaller and simpler

Last edited by JohnKFT; 03-20-2005 at 04:54 PM.
 
Old 03-20-2005, 01:02 AM   #14
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally posted by clawhead
If you try Rox, keep it on your system for a couple of days. You might not like it right away, but nearly everyone who sticks with it more than a few hours really likes it.
Completely second that. (And third through sixth, it seems.) I *hated* rox when I first tried it and deleted it. Another round of disatisfaction with everything else and I tried it again. Still hated it but something bugged me about it and I kept around for quite some time. Eventually I found myself using it more and more and eventually realized I really really liked it. So it was more like a few weeks or months for me, but yeah - rox is excellent. For dual-panes, I like emelfm (had a bad experience with gentoo ) and for trees, xfe is nice - better to me than the pathfinder that comes with fox, though it's a fox app, too. Don't much care for trees though. A lot of rox and a little emelfm, mc (I was a dual-pane fanatic before rox) and CLI do for me.

On an eye-candy note, ya gotta grab the Crystal icons or something, though - rox's default icons make me ill.
 
Old 03-20-2005, 01:37 AM   #15
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,752

Rep: Reputation: 463Reputation: 463Reputation: 463Reputation: 463Reputation: 463
ROX simply helps you get more done. It does take getting used to though, as it follows a RISC-like philosophy, and has some unexpected features.
I'd never dream of using Konqueror for anything. Treacle is a nice, polite word... What I accomplish in 10 minutes with ROX would take an hour with Konqueror -I swear it!

A little history about others (as I gather):
gentoo and worker (maybe emelfm also) forked from gtk_file_manager.

pathfinder and xfe are rewrites or forks of the original xwc

For those who like ROX, but have very old hardware or not much space, use the old GTK+-1.2 ROX-Filer. Now, you talk about Screaming!
Install rox-base 1.0.0 first, then ROX-filer 1.2.2 (binary). Then buckle up!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simple File/Window Managers? Vampirite Slackware 13 10-24-2005 12:45 PM
file managers wuya Linux - Software 1 05-11-2005 05:05 AM
2 questions (fluxbox/file managers) drisay Slackware 5 10-20-2004 01:20 PM
x file managers? externalgreenfu Linux - Software 2 07-20-2003 11:11 AM
File Managers NSKL Linux - General 7 06-09-2002 11:34 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration