Nope, it's "X Windows" ;) In Slack 10.1, I believe that X.Org is used. So, best title for that section is either "X Windows" or "X.org" or possibly "GUI"
I get one line run out of the table, and thats part of a new rc.local, so it doesn't matter to me. (Firefox 1.0.1, WinXP)
Ok took a long long read and has a major question. I have this system running like a top. CUPs to print, sound working display to 1280x1024 nVidia GeForce 2 MX 400 no nVidia Drivers. Slackware 10.1 using Reiserjfs as the format for my 30gb drive and also the jfs.s bizimage as it seems to be the only one that works like a champ here. Tried many other formats but none seemed to do what they should and the reiserjfs seems to be the pref for this system. Will the new Kernal understand this or hose my system and make my drive a 528MB drive? I would dl ths and do all that is said but it makes me concerned that since I am using this format it may not like the jfs.s image I am using. Any help, would be much appreciated.
Keeps the old Kernel and does not remove for Error reasons posted in the readme. The issue is the few modules that are made, are I guess still in the system, this causes some errors.
I have found all the reiserfs settings and makes it a part of the kernel, the other items are modules, since they are not actually a full part of the system.
My Main Modules are
These are all I want as modules.
Is this in the /usr/src like you state? or the /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.X ?? This is where I get lost terribly. I thiink it's just me being upset after I get several errors on the complie. I have all the most recent updates, slapt-get and using all the -current slackware updates. PHP 5.05 and also X11 6.2.8, all from the slackware-current.
I successfully made a good build in the Linux 126.96.36.199 recently but somehow it did not make the 188.8.131.52 links correctly, and this was with the xconfig. I have found the right NIC settings finally. I am still working out some details on the errors and why the are there. So far it seems that it builds it correctly, with
Everything goes just right, excepting if I forget to disable things I do not have enabled on the hardware, it crashes it. There is only one area that I have not been able to get to sstop erroring.
Here, maybe you can tell me what or where this is.
errors in intermodule.o
Kernel Intermodule 179 Intermodule Register - is depreciated - declared at kernel intermodule.c 38
Kernel Intermodule 180 Intermodule UnRegister - is depreciated - declared at kernel intermodule.c 79
Kernel Intermodule 183 Intermodule Put - is depreciated - declared at kernel intermodule.c 160
I have not beenable to find anything regarding these errors, and everytime I get these errors, the whole system crashes.
Hopes you can make heads or tails of this. I tried to detail it better here.
Nice site. I really like the layout.
Kernel Intermodule 179 Intermodule Register is depreciated Declared at Kernel Intermodule.c39
Kernel Intermodule 180 Intermodule Un-Register is depreciated Declared at Kernel Intermodule.c79
Kernel Intermodule 183 Intermodule Put is depreciated Declared at Kernel Intermodule.c160
This is the error I get when Icomplle it, this happens on every Kernel from 2.6 to 184.108.40.206, and has never been fixed or answered. I have tried everything to make this go away, and nothing. I am going to do a new make manuconfig and write everything I do and change in it here. Maybe then someone can see what I do wrong, or what I am missing.
Copy and paste error messages. Their easier to Google than when you manually type them.
Try this first
Downgrade gcc to the stock 10.1 version.
You should also make a new thread. Not everyone rteads this thread to see what new problems people are having.
This is not a problem.
Kernel Comiple Errors
Ok here goes.
Linux 220.127.116.11 Compile information
Code Maturity Left alone no changes
Append to Kernel, Slackware 18.104.22.168
Changes BSD Support on
kernel .config support on
Lodable Module support no changes
Processor type Sub No changes
Processor Family from P4 to AMD K62
Symmetric Processors off
No other changes
Power Managemant ACPI OFF
-Usually get errors.
Bus Options No Changes
Executeable File Formats ALL On no changes.
-----Hotplug from Module to Included
--Multi IO yes
--IEEE 1284 Yes
PnP no changes
-----IO Schedulers OFF (Note this is the first time disablng this)
--Ram Disk Support
generic ide off
PnP IDE OIn
generic IDE Off
Intel PII Off
VIA82CXX On (has DFI K6BV3+ Rev A+ VT82C586B/82C598MVP CHipset)
Disk support off
All others left unchanged excepting the SCSI Adaptors OFF
Old devices off
Muliti No changes Off
IEEE 1394 Off Not On system
--IP Advanced Router On
--IP Tunneling On
--IPv6 Limit Match ON Change
-------Mac ON Changed
-------IPv6 Ext Header On Changed
-------Packet Filtering On Changed
--SCPT all On HMAC MD5
Dummy Chaned to Built in
-----DECchip Tulip DC2114X Enabled Built in (Only one that does not error)
Realtek Changed OFF
GB Networking S210 Off Was Module
--Intel 440 OFF
Misc all off no changes
Video yes all else off
--Support for Frame Buffer Yes
--nVidia Yes (nVidia GeForce 2 MX 400)
No other changes all off
Sound, ALL Modules
USB Printer OFF
Mass Storage OFF
IBM PC Netcam Xirlink
MMC / Infinband Off No changes
Reiserfs Built in
No other changes
Profiling, no changes
All off no changes.
Saved Kernel did not make yet.
Re: Kernel Comiple Errors
but will tell you that your method of CONFIGURING the kernel
is wrong. Linus Torvalds has written a fine little HOW-TO that
you can read at ./linux-22.214.171.124/README that will explain the
proper way to install, configure, and compile a kernel from
I still do not understand why people think it necessary to try
and "reinvent the wheel" when Linus has taken the time to
post The Correct Way (TM) and It Just Works (TM)
Re: Re: Kernel Comiple Errors
You've got too much here to really talk about. As Shiloh said,
start a new thread.
My point is that Linus tells us how to compile a custom kernel,
and with 2.6.x the steps are:
"make menuconfig" Text based color menus, radiolists & dialogs.
or "make xconfig" X windows (Qt) based configuration tool.
or "make gconfig" X windows (Gtk) based configuration tool.
or "make oldconfig"
( It is also possible to do "make install" if you have lilo installed to suit the
kernel makefiles, but you may want to check your particular lilo setup first.)
You have a problem with compiling a kernel.
Make a new thread.
there is an wrror and if I am making it, it is because I followed your instructions from here.
Printed and read several tiimes, then took the chance and crash. Tried something a little different, changed the hardware information and got close to working. Read the post carefully because it asks some very important questions, like if I don't have it, why should it be enabled, if it's not there? If there is a device I do not have installed, then shoudl it be enabled even though I don't have it? EG IEE1394, I have no IEEE1394 Adapters or connections of thta type on my system, should it be enabled, even though Idon't have it on the system?
When I do i get kernel panic.
I didn't bother to read past that line. You are of course free to do whatever you want. If you want help, I would recommend that your choice be...
...Start a new thread. It has been said several times. If you don't want to follow the recommendations that others are giving, you are greatly limiting the amount of support you will get.
You want people who come to this thread to see your (as yet non-existant) new thread? Post a link to it.
Reading farther into your thread as I type,
To expand on that, I never use
...start a new thread.
The first question that comes to mind... does having the bad attitude usually work for you? Blame everyone else. You are the one who has a busted method, and thus, a busted system.
Your problems are your own. You DIDN'T follow the instructions here, or you wouldn't have had to do a fresh install because your 2.6 kernel didn't work. You'd simply boot your 2.4 kernel and try again.
Real simple conclusion to all your ranting. Hope someone helps you. I won't.
Yes I did read all the things, everything several posted xconfig, some gconfig and the read me says the same thing.
The defaults are what is in the sorce information,. Take a look one time. extract the filles to some directory that won't affect your system. then run any form of the config you want. Look carefully at teh screens where the Checkmarks are. Or the [M] are. on th xconfig it is a dot. Now in it, check the Processor family, it defaults to a Pentium 4 system. Then look at the IEEE1394 and tell me it is not enabled by default. Then get back to me.
|All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.|