SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I am looking at setting up a couple of KVM (Kernel Virtual Machine) based virtual servers. They will have dual quad core Xeon processors and about 16GB of ram. I am partial to Slackware but am wondering if this is not a good fit for Slack. I know I can access the large memory with kernel options on a 32 bit system, but would I see a substantial improvement in performance by going to a 64 bit system?
Just to clarify, the systems I intend to virtualize would all be 32 bit based and not need more than 3GB of ram.
I know this gets into Slackware vs XXX but should I consider Slamd 64 or maybe a more mature 64 bit distro like debian. I am a little bit skeptical of Slamd not being supported along with the base Slackware. Does anyone have some insight to offer from their personal experience building a virtual server?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.