LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-16-2012, 01:46 PM   #31
Martinus2u
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 342

Rep: Reputation: 55

Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
No offense meant, but I wonder why people don't actually read what Microsofts requirements are:
No offense taken. But do you really wonder why people do not keep reading documents containing 175 pages sitting on some server at Microsoft? Anyway, thanks for finding both the document and the relevant section!

Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Microsoft would be sued to hell in the EU and I think even in the US of A they would see another anti-trust lawsuit.
Maybe they would, but you know what world we live in and what measures are possible in formerly democratic countries under the pretense of fighting (1) terrorists (2) music pirates and (3) child pornographers - in that order.
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:56 PM   #32
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 15,357
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980Reputation: 3980
Secure Boot will neither protect from terrorists nor music or software piracy nor child pornographers. And I think the anti-trust authorities here in the EU wouldn't believe something like that.
 
Old 10-16-2012, 05:28 PM   #33
Didier Spaier
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware{,64}-14.1 on a Lenovo T61 6457-4XG
Posts: 3,955

Rep: Reputation: 936Reputation: 936Reputation: 936Reputation: 936Reputation: 936Reputation: 936Reputation: 936Reputation: 936
Signed Kernel Modules Support For Linux 3.7

This is the title of an article from Michael Larabel I juste read on Phoronix. Let me quote a paragraph of it:
Quote:
The most pressing need for the module signing support is for UEFI SecureBoot so that the Linux kernel can reject loading any unsigned modules, which could pose a threat if it's malicious code or unsigned binary blobs.
I don't know it that will add something useful the fu{n,d}. Just wanted to feed the discussion before going to sleep
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Working System will not boot, I do not understand the messages on the screen. flatstan Linux - Software 5 11-15-2011 11:35 AM
Don't understand, where I can find Fedora 12 boot.img?! proNick Fedora - Installation 6 03-17-2010 04:39 PM
Need help to understand /boot entries with 2 Kernels Orangutanklaus Slackware 5 08-21-2006 05:25 AM
I don't understand:Fast LILO boot floppy kocoman Linux - Software 1 06-16-2005 12:37 AM
Want some understand of boot folder Tyir Slackware 1 01-02-2004 09:25 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration