Does anyone know if there's a "12" version of Zipslack?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Does anyone know if there's a "12" version of Zipslack?
I have a machine that can only boot from the HD or the floppy. I can copy files to it through various means but I cannot boot from a CD, USB Drive, or the network card. I need to know if Zipslack has been updated to 12 before I waste my time downloading it to try to do a HD setup. I'm on dial-up.
If I heard it right, there will/should not be ZipSlack12, because it's meant to be installed on a DOS partition, and the new kernel 2.6 used in Slack doesn't do that. Something like that. There are more precise pieces of information on other threads, please search.
EDIT: one way that you could try is install ZipSlack11 and try to upgrade the needed software to the versions of Slack12.
I should have thought of using the dist-upgrade route from 11. It seems so obvious. See, the main thing is that I can't make a bootable CD of 12, but I DO have a bootable CD of 11, so I guess I'll just throw on 11 and go to 12 from the HD. I'll remember to search the forums next time, too. It's kind of good to know other people have the same idea, but I wonder if it's a good idea.
Sure it's a good idea! The thing is that kernel-2.6 does not support the umsdos file system. But once you have migrated your zipslack installation to a parttion with a regular linux file system like reiserfs or ext2 you can upgrade all you want and use the new kernels.
Over the years zipslack has gotten a lot of undeserved bad press. I use to always start my installations with zipslack. Now I just install from my running system after making a slight change to the doinst.sh for glibc which makes this possible.
Distribution: Slackware / Debian / *Ubuntu / Opensuse / Solaris uname: Brian Cooney
Posts: 503
Rep:
If you DO install 11 first and then upgrade, make sure you follow the directions in the CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT file. Just doing a dist-upgrade with slapt get or the like, or in any other way not following thoes instructions, WILL break your system.
On that thought, two other ideas for you
Do you know WHY it wont boot to cd? Mabey there is a way around that.
If your on dialup, do you have a friend or a library where you can download .iso's and burn them?
Hi, guys! First, thanks to everybody. I got 12 installed by:
1. Switching CD drives and booting from there.
2. Installing Slackware 11 - just the "a" series.
3. Using the most of instructions in UPGRADE.TXT.
4. Installing everything else using the "install-packages" scripts.
I used a kind of ugly hack on my /etc/groups file to get hal working, and I built a smaller, non-smp 2.6.21.5 kernel which seems to be fine even though I'm not using an initrd. Overall, I'd say it worked pretty well. The network's up, sound is working, and X was a breeze. I'm using XFCE and I was pleasantly surprised by its progress. I haven't tried KDE yet but I'm sure I'll like it. Now, I just have to figure out why my Nvidia drivers don't want to compile. I already like 12 better than I did 11. I tried 11 and went straight back to 10.2, but I think I'll probably stick with 12.
I just needed to get the new nvidia drivers and everything was great. KDE was a little too much for this old P3 550, but XFCE is cool. I even upgraded the kernel to 2.6.22. I can't wait for the new scheduler in 2.6.23.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.