LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices



Poll: Do you like the look of the fonts in 13.37
Poll Options
Do you like the look of the fonts in 13.37

You must log in and have one post to vote in this poll. If you don't have an account, you can register here.
Results will be available after the polls close.

The nominees are:

Yes.
No.
Like I give a ...... My eyesight is so bad it makes no difference.

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2011, 01:44 AM   #1
samac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Westray, Orkney
Distribution: Linux Mint 17.1
Posts: 1,424

Rep: Reputation: 137Reputation: 137
Do you like the look of the fonts in 13.37 ?


A nice simple YES / NO / OFNAP (Oh! **** not another poll) poll about the font rendering in the latest and, in my not so humble opinion, the greatest release of Slackware.

I just changed my fonts back to the old method using the information found in http://slackware.osuosl.org/slackwar..._AND_HINTS.TXT, and from the number of threads about this subject I'm probably not the only one.

samac
 
Old 04-30-2011, 01:47 AM   #2
kkady32
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 86

Rep: Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by samac View Post
A nice simple YES / NO / OFNAP (Oh! **** not another poll) poll about the font rendering in the latest and, in my not so humble opinion, the greatest release of Slackware.
yes
 
Old 04-30-2011, 02:32 AM   #3
tommcd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Philadelphia PA USA
Distribution: Lubuntu, Slackware
Posts: 2,230

Rep: Reputation: 288Reputation: 288Reputation: 288
For what it's worth, I have never had a problem with fonts on any linux distro I have ever used.
Since I have been using linux, the fonts on Windows XP look really crappy to me by comparison. I don't know why that is. I have never had to do anything special with fonts on linux. They always just look fine to me.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 04:29 AM   #4
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
As long as they're readable they're alright. They're different from previous versions (because of freetype), but they look ok to me.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 05:21 AM   #5
GazL
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 3,502

Rep: Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024
I'd forgotten all about this. When the change first hit current I was horrified by the new font rendering, but after adding 10-autohints and getting used to the slight differences that still remained I'd consider it "ok".

I'm still not convinced it looks as good as the old rendering, but that's probably getting into the territory of individual preference. I also suspect that the physical characteristics of the monitor being used also play a factor. Default Vista font settings don't look too great on my screen either.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 05:39 AM   #6
Ilgar
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Distribution: Slackware 14.1, Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 930

Rep: Reputation: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommcd View Post
For what it's worth, I have never had a problem with fonts on any linux distro I have ever used.
Since I have been using linux, the fonts on Windows XP look really crappy to me by comparison.
I agree with that (the XP part). Still, I voted no because, even though the new look wasn't too bad, the old one was much smoother to my eyes. This might look surprising since the patented, "precious" code might be thought to be "better", but from what I've read it seems that the patented code is more suitable for commercial fonts, whereas the alternative code is better for the free fonts. This may explain the situation.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 05:54 AM   #7
imitheos
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 374

Rep: Reputation: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by GazL View Post
I'd forgotten all about this. When the change first hit current I was horrified by the new font rendering, but after adding 10-autohints and getting used to the slight differences that still remained I'd consider it "ok".
Yeah me too. When i upgraded at that time and started firefox, i said omg what is this, but adding 10-autohint fixed it. I don't understand why the rendering was horrible though. This super-duper bytecode interpreter supposedly was so good that they patented it. Shouldn't it make rendering better ?

Edit: Oops, Ilgar got to it first

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ilgar View Post
from what I've read it seems that the patented code is more suitable for commercial fonts, whereas the alternative code is better for the free fonts. This may explain the situation.
Nice, article. The "does not work well (or at all) for non-Western text that requires a different approach to hinting." fact is weird though. When i enabled autohint i had better Greek rendering (unless "non-Western" is referring to Chinese/Japanese fonts)

Last edited by imitheos; 04-30-2011 at 06:03 AM.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 06:07 AM   #8
dive
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,211

Rep: Reputation: 293Reputation: 293Reputation: 293
I voted no and used the reversion trick. The problem was that system fonts looked smaller and pixelated, but using that trick now fonts on some web pages in chromium are a lot larger than they used to be.

*Edit: having tried both settings I prefer how web pages are rendered with autohinting off. I'm not sure why it should change the size of fonts..

Last edited by dive; 04-30-2011 at 06:13 AM.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 07:15 AM   #9
cwizardone
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current & "True Multilib." PC-BSD.
Posts: 2,272

Rep: Reputation: 186Reputation: 186
Quote:
Do you like the look of the fonts in 13.37
In KDE a big, NO.

In Xfce, yes, but the fonts have always looked better in Xfce, IMHO. By "always," I mean in Xfce versions 4.6.1/2 and 4.8, running in Slackware64, 13.1, current, and 13.37.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 08:08 AM   #10
chrisretusn
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 508

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I'm OK with the fonts.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 08:09 AM   #11
blue_k
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2011
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0 & Slackware 13.37
Posts: 121

Rep: Reputation: 5
Yes, I like them.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 08:31 AM   #12
Breeze
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Distribution: ArchLinux,Slackware
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 4
I change to 13.1 fonts.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 08:45 AM   #13
bgeddy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Liverpool - England
Distribution: slackware64 13.37 and -current, Dragonfly BSD
Posts: 1,810

Rep: Reputation: 227Reputation: 227Reputation: 227
Quote:
In KDE a big, NO.
I've got to agree with this. Before I read C+H hints I thought I'd either have to permanently use XFCE or switch back to 13.1 as the fonts in KDE were so bad. They actually strained my eyes in certain applications and where effectively unusable. The hint in C+H has put everything back to normal. I think some people must have a very different set up than me because if everyone had the same look to their fonts as I had then no one would vote YES!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-30-2011, 09:41 AM   #14
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,381

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Spam reported to the moderators.

Eric
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-30-2011, 10:07 AM   #15
Breeze
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Distribution: ArchLinux,Slackware
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 4
In Xfce,I don't like it.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A frontend to change the fonts of xterm/mrxvt using the ~/.fonts folder ? frenchn00b Linux - General 1 05-28-2008 01:28 PM
[Console] an xterm type with ttf fonts as fonts ? frenchn00b Linux - Desktop 1 08-04-2007 05:32 PM
what's diference betwen core fonts and xft fonts? xcore_on Linux - Newbie 2 04-29-2006 09:11 PM
Fonts question: how to get a full list of fonts in Abiword vharishankar Linux - Software 1 03-17-2005 12:11 PM
fonts.scale/fonts.dir: Naming convention kaon Linux - General 0 08-09-2004 06:02 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration