SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Anyone has any ideas about this? I have seen that some other people have similiar problems but till now haven't found any good explanation about it or how to fix it.
Please post the contents of /etc/fstab and the results of 'fdisk -l' (lower-case L for list).
Is this error triggered by a zip disk or a fat partition on your hard drive?
I've noticed this error when trying to access access improperly-formatted zip disks. Not sure if it popped up in dmesg, but whenever I tried to mount it, I could swear that was the same error.
I get that same message on my old pentium 100mhz. It doesn't have any FAT partitions. I don't get the message on my main box, which is a dual boot with Windows. I figured that it must have something to do with not having a fat partition. I've never had any problems besides the error message, though.
I get the same msg on Slack 9.1, but never noticed any problems...............I don't have any FAT partitions and recently removed my Zip drive and replaced it with new hdd and noticed no change in the boot msg...........
What's happening is this: Since umsdosfs support is compiled into the kernel(not as a module), when the kernel finishes loading and goes to look for the / mount it first checks for a FAT partition with a folder called linux, with a file called --linux-.--- . If it finds that it will try to mount the file system inside that folder.
Since your system is not umsdos, then it reports the failure to find a 'pseudo-root'.
Also, if you try to mount a partition without specifying the fs type, linux will go through the list of filesystems in /proc/filesystems, and try to mount using each fs type until it is successful. VFAT comes before the linux fs types, so you may get similar errors if you mount without giving fs type or have an 'auto' entry in fs type in fstab.
You can compile a new kernel with no umsdos support (or compiled as a module) to eliminate the 'error' in the kernel messages.
the word 'error' in the kernel messages shouldn't always be taken too seriously.
it's just that the kernel is not too verbose. if the system boots succesfully, most errors can be safely ignored.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.