LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-22-2007, 10:16 PM   #1
slack66
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: manila
Distribution: slackware 8 to 9
Posts: 199

Rep: Reputation: 30
can linux handle windows vista ???


hi

right now iam handling at least 80 pc running windows XP PRO and 10 linux file server (slackware 10.0 and 10.2)
using SAMBA i have no problem connecting all my 80 pc to my file server....Now that Microsoft finally anouncing that it will release it new version of windows "Vista" iam worry that i will facing a big problem and my boss told me that were plannig to upgrade our client pc XP to Vista can any one give me a brief and quick explanation about windows new version "Vista" and how will be dificult to conect to a Linux files server running Samba"

thanks
 
Old 01-22-2007, 10:23 PM   #2
mrapathy
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: debian/slackware
Posts: 90

Rep: Reputation: 17
samba and wine projects are crazy no other projects have been as crazy or changing.

samba will do its best to adapt but microsoft never makes it easy.

depends on what the new ms vista/mac+tpm computer is like. could be a new monopoly coming. way they are wired and licensed its no longer the personal computer with microsoft,intel and mac.
 
Old 01-23-2007, 03:00 AM   #3
davidsrsb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 current
Posts: 770

Rep: Reputation: 33
samba 4 (still in development) is designed to support Vista
 
Old 01-23-2007, 08:21 AM   #4
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,515

Rep: Reputation: 62
@slack66:

I should think that samba 4 probably will get released quickly since the Novell (R)- Microsoft (R) deal. Tho, one of the highly visible members of the samba team has "left the building" as a result of the Novell (R)- Microsoft (R) deal.

I think a bigger question is to your employer, why upgrade pc's to vista at this time? I truly understand the desire of your employer, XP is really at a point that you can't throw any money at it to be secure. Why do you think I switched to linux But, seeing how these antivirus guys just got code not too long ago how smart of a move is this? The AV vendors have only had so long to do testing. MS is calling for developer's to help service pack 1 for vista to get it out this summer! You see they know that nobody with half a brain will buy any version of Windows until SP1... you only let a dog bite you so many times. I'd say hold off a little while longer. The holidays are over, and the hard core programmer's are really sifting thru the final shipped version of vista, and haste is not waste here.
 
Old 01-23-2007, 08:29 AM   #5
Jorophose
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Xubuntu 6.06!! =D
Posts: 137

Rep: Reputation: 15
Keep XP Pro until the service is cut off.

Imho. Much better than to waste time with Vista now. You can slack off, and still get security updates.
 
Old 01-23-2007, 10:39 AM   #6
michaelk
Moderator
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 11,923

Rep: Reputation: 747Reputation: 747Reputation: 747Reputation: 747Reputation: 747Reputation: 747Reputation: 747
I will second the opinion that is better to wait. However, I would setup a seperate test network so you can make sure it all works together. My company probably took 6 months to a year to plan, test and implement migrating from W2k to XP.
 
Old 01-23-2007, 02:00 PM   #7
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
Really there shouldn't be a problem. I mean, Vi$ta will have to be at least compatible with XP, and if so, chances are it will also be compatible with samba and maybe wine too.

(I know that M$ has tried for a while now to sabotage samba and/or make Window$ incompatible with samba ... so far, luckily, they have not succeeded)

Really, you might just have to wait and find out.
 
Old 01-23-2007, 05:20 PM   #8
slack66
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: manila
Distribution: slackware 8 to 9
Posts: 199

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks guys for your oppinion i will try to convince my boss to wait until sp2 has been realse i wish and i pray that linux someday will be as popular as M$soft I DONT WANT TO GO BACK TO MICROSOFT SERVER

LONG LIVE SLACKWARE FOREVER!!!
 
Old 01-23-2007, 09:20 PM   #9
Basslord1124
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Ashland, KY
Distribution: Debian, Puppy/Slacko
Posts: 351

Rep: Reputation: 31
From what I have seen from Vista, I wasn't too impressed anyways. And I am not one of those who is full-on anti Microsoft.
 
Old 01-24-2007, 08:42 AM   #10
davidsrsb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 current
Posts: 770

Rep: Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H
Really there shouldn't be a problem. I mean, Vi$ta will have to be at least compatible with XP
It is not fully compatible with XP, in particular CD burning software, antivirus and anything that wants to get down deep in the hardware like dongle drivers is in trouble.
Vista goes to some trouble to prevent vitualisation, presumably to stop debuggers and virtual audio drivers from grabbing potentially DRMed content.
 
Old 02-05-2007, 03:40 PM   #11
Spinlock
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Missouri
Distribution: Slackware -current, Slackware64 -current, Slackware 12.2
Posts: 135

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidsrsb
It is not fully compatible with XP, in particular CD burning software, antivirus and anything that wants to get down deep in the hardware like dongle drivers is in trouble.
Vista goes to some trouble to prevent vitualisation, presumably to stop debuggers and virtual audio drivers from grabbing potentially DRMed content.
Which, by the by, has nothing at all to do with file-sharing capabilities. They already have enough trouble with home, and other, networking... I really can't see them breaking Samba compatibility just to be facetious. They've been burned on that before.
 
Old 02-05-2007, 04:20 PM   #12
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 22,978
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879
Quote:
Originally Posted by slack66
hi:)

right now iam handling at least 80 pc running windows XP PRO and 10 linux file server (slackware 10.0 and 10.2)
using SAMBA i have no problem connecting all my 80 pc to my file server....Now that Microsoft finally anouncing that it will release it new version of windows "Vista" iam worry that i will facing a big problem and my boss told me that were plannig to upgrade our client pc XP to Vista:( can any one give me a brief and quick explanation about windows new version "Vista" and how will be dificult to conect to a Linux files server running Samba"

thanks:)
Do you have a NEED to move the 80+ machines running
windows to vista? From the perspective of big organisations
I can assure you that vista is still in a distant future.
Many are still running win2k desktops, contemplating to
move to XP now that it has overcome many of its
flaws. In a production environment migrating to a newly
released product is next to a suicide-attempt.



Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 02-06-2007, 01:56 AM   #13
Alien_Hominid
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lithuania
Distribution: Hybrid
Posts: 2,247

Rep: Reputation: 53
And why does your boss want to migrate to vista? Is there any special and required feature which isn't in xp? Or is it just like we should have latest and greatest and there is aero. Nah. Your 80+ machines will be slower because vista is bloated.

EDIT: And trying to protect drm is a waste of time, because it will be cracked like hd-dvd was.

Last edited by Alien_Hominid; 02-06-2007 at 01:59 AM.
 
Old 02-06-2007, 08:26 AM   #14
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,177

Rep: Reputation: 541Reputation: 541Reputation: 541Reputation: 541Reputation: 541Reputation: 541
I'm planning to eventually buy a Vista box for my daughter (she's not that interested in Linux), but, I'm going to wait 6-12 months and let things get sorted out:-)
I would wait, and run a test machine on Vista with samba. If your job is on the line I would be cautious about moving too quickly.
 
Old 02-06-2007, 09:15 AM   #15
davidsrsb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 current
Posts: 770

Rep: Reputation: 33
Moving old machines to a new Windows OS is not a good idea - too many missing device drivers and inadequate performance.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: How Linux can compete with Windows Vista LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-18-2006 12:03 PM
LXer: Linux vs. Windows Vista vs. Leopard LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-01-2006 09:33 AM
LXer: Windows Guru: Why Samba can't handle Vista... And It's Not Samba's Fault LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-01-2006 05:03 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration