LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-14-2007, 04:56 PM   #1
BW64User
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Bluewhite64 12.0 released!


Hi there Slackware users

For those who are interested, there is an unofficial 64 bit version of Slackware, Bluewhite64 Linux (www.bluewhite64.com). The maintainer just released the version 12.0. Give it a spin!

Last edited by XavierP; 07-14-2007 at 04:57 PM.
 
Old 07-14-2007, 04:58 PM   #2
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429
Good news for 64 bit Slackers! (I fixed your URL - you had the close bracket included in the URL.)
 
Old 08-07-2007, 03:46 AM   #3
BW64User
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Hey

A LiveDVD is available with Bluewhite64 Linux 12.0 with a lot of goodies

Check this out at http://www.bluewhite64.com/page.php?25
 
Old 08-07-2007, 04:03 AM   #4
Mark Havel
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Lyon, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 85

Rep: Reputation: 15
What is the difference between BW64 and Slamd64, which is another x64 port of Slackware?
 
Old 08-07-2007, 06:13 AM   #5
BW64User
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Havel
What is the difference between BW64 and Slamd64, which is another x64 port of Slackware?
Bluewhite64 is the second unofficial port of Slackware and the differences are many. I'm not using Slamd64 anymore, it is not up to date and I need supported software for my servers. I recommend you to try Bluewhite64, here works great .
 
Old 08-07-2007, 06:30 AM   #6
MS3FGX
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351
I have a suspicion he might have been looking for a bit more to go on then "the differences are many".

Last edited by MS3FGX; 08-07-2007 at 07:39 AM.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 07:28 AM   #7
Mark Havel
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Lyon, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 85

Rep: Reputation: 15
You are perfectly right MS3FGX. Well, actually, I would be curious to know how this kind of port is working. Is it just recompile the package for an x64 architecture or does it need more in depht modifications? What about the 32 bits retrocompatibility then?

I even want to ask why they did not seem to have capitalised the efforts made by Slamd64 to continue it if Slamd64 is discontinued. Which brings me to the fact that an official support of x64 architecture would be a great thing to bring for the next Slackware major release as these CPU will become more and more common and we will soon hit the 4 GB memory limit of the 32 bit architecture.

Last edited by Mark Havel; 08-07-2007 at 07:35 AM.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 07:44 AM   #8
MS3FGX
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351
I think it is generally just a matter of recompiling everything for 64 bit, which is not much of a task in reality since the official Slackware build scripts for all of the packages already include a x86_64 bit option, you simply need to enable it and rebuild the package. Not that it is a walk in the park to recompile every single package in Slackware, but it isn't exactly rocket science either.

The presence of the x86_64 option in the build scripts may indicate that an eventual move to 64 bit is in the cards. Of course, on the other hand, there is also an option for s390 in the build scripts, so it could be that Pat just tries to make things a little easier for those doing the porting.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 08:58 AM   #9
reverse
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 337

Rep: Reputation: 30
BW64User: Arny is that you?
 
Old 08-07-2007, 09:41 AM   #10
arny
Bluewhite64
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Baia Mare, Maramures, Romania
Distribution: Bluewhite
Posts: 87

Rep: Reputation: 17
I'm arny and I don't know who BW64User is

Last edited by arny; 08-07-2007 at 09:46 AM.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 10:03 AM   #11
MS3FGX
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351
This topic looks to only be getting stranger.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 01:44 PM   #12
reverse
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 337

Rep: Reputation: 30
:-/ Hm. Yes, sorry, I thought the creator of BW64 made a totally unprofessional move and tried to advertise his own work whilst being incognito.
 
Old 08-17-2007, 09:22 AM   #13
Mark Havel
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Lyon, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 85

Rep: Reputation: 15
Well another thread about 64 bits Slackware have just bumped today and now, I can tell that this "arny" is the BlueWhite64 maintainer and also accused of having derivated its work from Slamd64 without crediting it nor telling it clearly.
 
Old 08-17-2007, 12:21 PM   #14
hrp2171
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: California, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 243
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 30
Looks like website issues with the side bar and the content pane, though.

The left side bar seems a little too wide and it pushes the content pane down the page.

1024x768 resolution on my LCD.
 
Old 08-17-2007, 01:08 PM   #15
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,122
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404
Hi,

Yes, 'Who's using Slackware? Post 57' was one with good information links for the BlueWhite vs Slam64 problem. Useful information to make your decision concerning the issue.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
configure cpuspeed bluewhite64 linux kanwar_rajan Linux - Laptop and Netbook 3 02-26-2007 09:28 AM
Slamd64 vs BlueWhite64 drewhead Slackware 4 10-06-2006 04:31 PM
LXer: Bluewhite64 11.0 RC1 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-21-2006 11:54 AM
Bluewhite64-current v20060609 arny Linux - News 1 06-21-2006 03:24 AM
LXer: Bluewhite64 Linux is an unofficial port of Slackware LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-12-2006 02:03 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration