SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I had a hard disk with four primary partitions (DOS style). All of them where created from a clean disk, by parted under slackware 14.0. Partition 4 was NTFS.
Today, I ran cfdisk, deleted it and created a new partition 4 type ext2. But when telling cfdisk to write, it did not output the message "wrote partition table".
Question: is this expected behavior in 14.0?
In short, the three programs write the partition table and, printing it, raw format, partition 4 shows 0x83 in the ID byte. But only fdisk list it as type 'ext2', The other too "see" NTFS, the previous fs type. The hard disk is SATA and, when I tried to install 10.2 on partition 4 the installer said it saw no partiotions at all! This can be because 10.2 is too old. But the second question is, why do these programs get confused? Another peculliarity of this machine, brand new, is that my old Linux from Scratch live CD and other Linux live CD after booting think the BIOS is in error. But it is them that do not undertand the machine architecture I think. I say this in case it helps.
Another thing: the machine is an Intel H61 (this is the PCH, platform controller hub, which replaces the motherboard, let's say; all very extrange to me).
I've had similar issues with those CLI partitioning tools, but never bothered to troubleshoot them. GParted is a rather nice program, as you probably know, so I'd recommend it. You will have to deal with a bunch of deps to get it running though.
The curious thing is what do you need 10.2 for if I may ask?
I can't mount the DVD bundled with my new machine, nor can I boot two linux live CDs without they objecting (don't find the fs). So, I blame 14.0 and, and wanted to see what happens with some older version.