Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
09-07-2012, 09:59 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 73
Rep: 
|
Best file system for storing videos
What would you guys recommend for storing videos 1-2 GB (mostly just TV shows, x264)
From what I've read I'm leaning towards XFS, but open to suggestions! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 10:12 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 616
Rep:
|
In a pedantic note that I am almost ashamed to put in here: your video stream is probably actually h.264 which has been encoded using x264....
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
09-07-2012, 10:13 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 2,969
|
On my HTPC for the past three years I am using a separate XFS partition for the videos. Handles large files nicely. Normal ext3 for the other partitions.
|
|
|
|
09-07-2012, 11:27 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Rep: 
|
I recently moved my media from an ext3 partition to an xfs partition on a different machine. They both have identical specs with 6GB RAM and 8 threaded i7 CPUs, but the xfs machine is running 64 -currnet and the other 32 -current. The total data was roughly 180GB on each partition and when I md5'd them both to verify the copy the xfs partition finished in 29 minutes vs 46 for the ext3. This is purely anecdotal and there are enough differences between the two setups that I wouldn't attribute it all to the filesystem, but this is in line with what I've read about xfs.
|
|
|
|
09-08-2012, 04:18 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Distribution: Slackware 13.37, Pardus 2011.2
Posts: 885
Rep:
|
I don't think that you would see much difference. Normal usage of a desktop user does not push the limits in any way. I used to have an XFS partition for movies on my external HDD but now I switched to NTFS so that I can use it easily on Windows computers, too. I haven't noticed any difference in performance, but then, as I said, in normal use I don't do anything that would show the difference (if any).
|
|
|
|
09-08-2012, 05:55 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: manchester, uk
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 90
Rep:
|
I use JFS for a similar purpose. I have a MythTV setup with 1Tb drive. The thing that made me chose JFS over XFS is that deleting large files is massively faster with JFS. I was finding deletes to be a problem when I had an older architecture.
In MythTV when you watch a lot of live TV, the cache fills up and then there are frequent deletes of large files (previous things you watched); anytime it would need to delete a file it would hang for a 1 or 2 seconds, rather annoying. With JFS I have no idea when files are being deleted.
Now with an i5 quad core it probably makes no difference if it is JFS or XFS. XFS has actually had some recent improvements, but I am not going to fix what is not broken.
|
|
|
|
09-10-2012, 04:21 AM
|
#7
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,706
|
I also recommend JFS or XFS.
|
|
|
|
09-10-2012, 07:45 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 73
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Thanks guys... Think I'm gonna go with XFS
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|