LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-25-2009, 02:09 PM   #16
forum1793
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 312

Rep: Reputation: 34

I just verified that for slackware64-current (and so at this time it would be applicable to slackware64-13.0) the ati installer for fglrx (catalyst) works without changing kernel or adding any 32 bit anything.

Both methods worked. Those being:
1) simply running sh ati*run (9.9 for me) or
2) running sh ati*run --buildpkg Slackware/All and then installing packages.

Keep in mind you should rmmod radeon and drm and then modprobe fglrx. If intending to continue running fglrx you should rename /lib/modules/... radeon.ko and drm.ko so they do not load on reboots.

If you go with option 1 above, the auto installer seems to create the necessary altered /etc/X11/xorg.conf. If you run option 2 you need to install/move/create this yourself.

This is for an r600 (hd3200). I realize some support dropped for earlier cards at 9.3 and above instructions do not apply.

Last edited by forum1793; 09-25-2009 at 02:11 PM.
 
Old 02-16-2010, 03:13 PM   #17
greenpoise
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 2
I cant run ati Catalyst at all. I get this error:

Quote:
Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.32.8'
make: *** [kmod_build] Error 2
build failed with return value 2
ERROR: i don't have make module
Removing temporary directory: fglrx-install.ldFrbD
any leads??

Thanks
 
Old 02-16-2010, 03:26 PM   #18
adamk75
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 3,091

Rep: Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396
Which version of catalyst? Catalyst 10.1 was the first version to support kernel 2.6.32.* iirc.

Adam
 
Old 02-16-2010, 06:48 PM   #19
greenpoise
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 2
is there a 10.1? this is a laptop, I could only find 9.3


thanks

dan
 
Old 02-16-2010, 06:50 PM   #20
adamk75
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 3,091

Rep: Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396
9.3 is the last version for non HD?xxx cards (for the 9550 through the x1900, roughly). If you are using one of those GPUs you should be using the open source driver. If you are using an HD2xxx or higher, you can use 10.1 from the AMD website.

Adam
 
Old 02-16-2010, 06:52 PM   #21
greenpoise
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 2
well I am currently using RadeonHD opensource but it can be sluggish. I have used catalyst with a 32bit Slackware before which led me to believe I could install it in 64 environment
 
Old 02-16-2010, 06:56 PM   #22
adamk75
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 3,091

Rep: Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396
Well I can assure you that catalyst 9.3 will not work on Slackware 13.0, 32-bit or 64-bit. Again, if your card is supported by the fglrx driver (and you haven't actually told us what card you are using), you should download the correct version from the AMD website. 10.1 is the only one to support kernel 2.6.32.* so far, from what I have read.

Adam
 
Old 02-16-2010, 06:59 PM   #23
greenpoise
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 2
I read that too. But I was able to do so in Slackware 12.2. My card is a Radeon Xpress 200M. Thanks Adam
 
Old 02-16-2010, 07:01 PM   #24
adamk75
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 3,091

Rep: Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396
Right, that's a non-HD card and, therefore, the last catalyst version to work on that GPU is 9.3. Which will not work with Slackware 13.0. If you absolutely must use catalyst, you will need to stick with an older distribution. The open source drivers, however, support both 2D and 3D acceleration on that GPU (I would recommend radeon instead of radeonhd).

Adam
 
Old 02-16-2010, 07:04 PM   #25
greenpoise
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 2
I see. Radeon instead. Makes sense! I am surprised the other one worked. And DRI for 3D right? Thanks again
 
Old 02-16-2010, 07:06 PM   #26
adamk75
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 3,091

Rep: Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396Reputation: 396
Yep. DRI/3D should work out-of-the-box in Slackware 13.0, in fact. There was a bug in Mesa last summer that impacted 3D performance on Express GPUs that might be present in the Mesa version in 13.0, but I'm not 100% sure of that.

Adam
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
slackware64 + multilib or simply install 32-bit? [GOD]Anck Slackware 1 08-31-2009 03:51 AM
Is it possible to have a 32-bit compatibility driver? Shingoshi Linux - Kernel 8 06-29-2009 01:54 PM
Slackware 64 Bit .. Needs 32 bit compatibility clowther Linux - Software 3 06-06-2009 12:55 PM
Slamd64 (64 Bit slackware) and ATI driver problems ljones0 Slackware 3 04-07-2009 10:03 AM
32-bit compatibility on a 64-bit AMD box ?? Rod Butcher Linux - General 4 01-11-2007 05:10 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration