LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-16-2009, 07:10 AM   #31
mudangel
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 267

Rep: Reputation: 48

@AGer: Thanks for your reply. While I don't entirely agree, I do see your point.

Quote:
There is a good reason why defaults in Linux are never right: all systems are different and nobody puts the "average user" needs above personal comfort and habits.
That's a tough one; how would you solve this issue?

Quote:
(1)...it was well explained why Slackware dropped GNOME. If Slackware decides to stop being a KDE distro, it can be achieved easily: move KDE to pasture...
(2)...if I do not install KDE what a GUI CD burner will I have?
There are XFCE goodies that are not included.
(1) I'd have no problem with that, though I am sure many would.
(2)Very good point. I used K3b previously- that's been my only use for the kdelibs/base packages for some time. With 13, I've been using xfburn; it's working quite well for me.
 
Old 11-16-2009, 01:05 PM   #32
BrZ
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 494

Rep: Reputation: 81
The more I use 13, more I like it...
 
Old 11-16-2009, 01:21 PM   #33
vtel57
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 858

Rep: Reputation: 88
Someone above said that Slackware 13 shouldn't be judged by its inclusion of KDE4. I agree. The WM/DE is not the OS. There are choices. That's the one of the greatest things about GNU/Linux.

As far as needing a burner app when you're not running KDE... what's wrong with xfburn. I use it. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles of K3b, but it's stable and efficient. Try it...

http://www.xfce.org/projects/xfburn/

Here's a SlackBuild of it...

http://slackbuilds.org/repository/13.0/system/xfburn/

It requires libburn and libsofs. These are also available as SlackBuilds.

Have fun!
 
Old 11-16-2009, 03:57 PM   #34
titopoquito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Ruhr Area, Germany
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 1,517

Rep: Reputation: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by allend View Post
Originally posted by titopoquito:

mirror.pacific.net.au was down from 12/11/2009 for server upgrade/improvement and is now back on line and working just fine.
Nice to hear that - there can't be enough mirrors I think.
I clicked all of them some days ago just out of curiosity, at least some were apparently dead (like an offer "domain for sale" and the usual advertising).
 
Old 11-16-2009, 04:52 PM   #35
sycamorex
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,564
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024Reputation: 1024
I second other LQ members' opinions. KDE is not everything that slackware offers.
After using KDE 3.5 on 12.2 I had a brief encounter with KDE 4.2.4. Due to known issues with 4.2.4 I switched to XFCE and then fluxbox. Having used fluxbox for a while I decided to give KDE one more shot. This time it was kde 4.3 in slackware-current. It was noticeably more stable than 4.2.4, but it did have its shortcomings. Consequently, I returned to fluxbox. I configured LOTS of key shortcuts which makes operating it very quick and comfortable.
 
Old 11-16-2009, 05:17 PM   #36
dunix
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Vermont
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL/CentOS, Fedora
Posts: 40

Rep: Reputation: 18
I'm not sure I buy the, don't judge Slackware by KDE's performance. The Slackware 'team' decided to put KDE in, so thus I feel fine judging them over this. 'They' decided not to include Gnome and go with KDE. 'They' decided to use KDE 4.x over KDE 3.5.x. If it was really felt that KDE 4.x wasn't ready they wouldn't have put it in.

All that being said... I've been a Slackware user since Slackware 10, and have hated every minute of using KDE when Gnome was taken out of the distro. I installed Slackware 13 the day it came out, and decided to try KDE4, and haven't looked back since. I've had some bumps in the road, but nothing like what I've seen on this board.

For a distro that doesn't include PAM for various reasons, you can't pass the buck on KDE.
 
Old 11-16-2009, 05:56 PM   #37
Daedra
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Distribution: Slackware64-14.1
Posts: 1,222

Rep: Reputation: 177Reputation: 177
Quote:
Originally Posted by boler View Post
Ok, I'm sure I'm going to get shot down in flames for saying this, but, after nearly 2 months of using Slackware 13 I'm disappointed, quite disappointed. I admit, most of the problems are due to using KDE 4.2.4. Amarok, Dolphin, Gxine, Xine crash a lot of the time. I honestly feel that (for me) as a average desktop user I am much less confident using Slackware 13.0 than Slackware 12.2.

For me I am sick to death of Dolphin crashing. Try holding the shift key to select a large number of multiple files in a directory for example. Instead of selecting all the files, all but the last 4 are selected and then I can't use the hold the Control key to select the last four.

Just ONE example of the problems I'm having.

Oh!, and how come the majority of the Slackware download mirrors never work???

Sorry for small rant... but...
Someone might have already said this but I don't wont to go through three pages to see... Anyway have you tried download a current ISO or upgrading to current? I have to finally say it aloud but I agree that KDE 4.2.4 is not that great, in fact I personally think it kind of sucks. That's why I switched to xfce. However 4.3.3 in current is quite nice and I have gone back. Might be worth a try for you.
 
Old 11-16-2009, 06:09 PM   #38
vtel57
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 858

Rep: Reputation: 88
Sadly, 4.2.4 really tainted my feelings toward KDE. I was a KDE user all along in my Slack installations all the way back to 10. I was so aggravated with the issues I was experiencing with KDE4(.2.4) in Slack64 that I just gave up. I went to Xfce and never turned back. Maybe I'll play around with KDE again when Slack 13.1 or .2 comes out.
 
Old 11-16-2009, 07:50 PM   #39
zbreaker
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: New York
Distribution: Slack -current, #!, vsido
Posts: 223

Rep: Reputation: 27
I live quite harmoniously with KDE & Slackware 13.
 
Old 11-17-2009, 05:07 AM   #40
AGer
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 136
Blog Entries: 22

Rep: Reputation: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by mudangel View Post
That's a tough one; how would you solve this issue?
With the current state of user - distribution maintainers -upstream relationships, nothing can be done. I guess the way out is to agree that:

1. A free end user general purpose OS cannot exist.
2. There can be at most one general purpose end user OS build with FOSS.
3. Stop laughing at Ubuntu or choose another candidate for that OS.
4. Make it clear for everyone that any other distro is not a general purpose end user OS.

Before: I started KDE in Slackware and it was no good. I am disappointed with Slackware. It contains crap.

After: I started KDE in Slackware and it was no good. I admire Slackware. It is so easy to estimate the current state of the KDE with it.
 
Old 11-17-2009, 05:14 AM   #41
n0xvb
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware 13; openSUSE 11.2
Posts: 255

Rep: Reputation: 32
Both GNOME and KDE are bloated, have been for a long time. My slack installs are purely for servers and have no GUI functions even installed. Slack 13 is solid as a rock on multiple machines in my server farm.

If I had to pick a WM? Definitely fluxbox or possibly blackbox. Both are fast as lightning and configurable.
 
Old 11-17-2009, 06:12 AM   #42
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,030
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
What am I doing wrong? I'm having no trouble at all with vbatts' KDE4.3.1 packages on 32 & 64 bit Slackware stable.

http://cardinal.lizella.net/~vbatts/...ackages/4.3.1/

Last edited by brianL; 11-17-2009 at 06:14 AM.
 
Old 11-17-2009, 07:28 AM   #43
GazL
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 3,392

Rep: Reputation: 917Reputation: 917Reputation: 917Reputation: 917Reputation: 917Reputation: 917Reputation: 917Reputation: 917
You're not the only one brian. I didn't have any significant issues with 4.2.4 either. Yes, there were a few bugs here and there, but nothing that seemed show stopping in any serious way. In fact prior to using KDE4 on slackware, I was a die hard WindowMaker user who hated KDE 3.5.

All I'm waiting for now is for someone to write a plasma widget that acts like the WindowMaker dock and I'm a happy KDE4 bunny.
 
Old 11-17-2009, 08:40 AM   #44
mudangel
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 267

Rep: Reputation: 48
@AGer: I'll start with 3: I very much dislike Ubuntu. This is a matter of personal preference, and I am well aware that there are many who use it happily. That's their choice; if it works for them, that's great, I don't have a problem with it.
1: contradicts the others.
2 & 4: Why only one? And(based on point 3) why does it have to be Ubuntu?

I still think it doesn't make sense to be disappointed with Slackware just because you don't like the version of KDE that shipped with it.
As several people have pointed out, some are using KDE4 with few or no problems; they seem to be happy enough with it.
I didn't have any problems when I briefly had KDE4 running; I just don't like KDE- that is, again, personal preference, and not meant to reflect on the software itself, or anyone who uses it. I use Fluxbox; I think it's great, and for me, it is. I have no doubt, however, that if Slackware used Fluxbox as it's only GUI, there would be a lot of unhappy users.
 
Old 11-17-2009, 09:16 AM   #45
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,170

Rep: Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534
I had no problems with KDE 4.2.4 in 13.0 or with KDE 4.3.3 in -current. I prefer using XFce and Fluxbox because they do what I want without using a lot of system overhead. You have a variety of DEs/WMs in Slackware to choose from.
Slackware is all about choice.
Ditching Slackware because you don't like KDE is over kill in my opinion, but, each to his own. If you try out other distros I guarantee you'll be back. They always come back.
 
  


Reply

Tags
general, slackware


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Great place, great people, and me feel great to be here rajshekarj LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 2 10-22-2009 03:34 PM
What is so great about Slackware anyway? ErrorBound Slackware 78 09-05-2008 04:39 PM
What is so great about Slackware? phantom_cyph Slackware 15 03-14-2007 02:12 AM
What is so great about Slackware? uman Slackware 73 11-13-2005 11:28 AM
I've decided on slackware...now... some qns.... stagnant7 Slackware 5 09-02-2003 03:57 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration