SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
See, I don't get that... This subject has been of great interest to me for quite some time now but I've never been able to figure out how to get extraordinary results like that. I always assume someone is pulling my leg (which, by the way, I haven't entirely ruled out)... Can you post your config section please? Now, I realize that a FX5200 is pretty much bottom of the barrel for Nvidia cards, but you think that I could be able to pull higher FPS that what I am on a 128mb GPU...
Code:
[root@jaguar ~] glxgears
5650 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1130.000 FPS
6528 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1305.600 FPS
6275 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1255.000 FPS
6056 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1211.200 FPS
6349 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1269.800 FPS
6300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1260.000 FPS
6167 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1233.400 FPS
6022 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1204.400 FPS
6381 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1276.200 FPS
6262 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1252.400 FPS
6153 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1230.600 FPS
Ugh... That irritates me. I've always gotten a constant 1305 but now it's being wierd... Anyway... You get the point.
So what gives anyway? I wish people would stop posting insanely ridiculous results so I could just stop worrying about it....
EDIT- Ohh.. I thought I saw 5 digit results and assumed you were full of it... (I was looking at your frames). That's still pretty good.. Would you mind posting your config section just for giggles? I have a feeling that I'm just working with a crap card that never should have been manufactured in the first place. I've never read anything good about 5200's, except that they are good for using as a paper weight...
Phifttt... What did that card cost you? Your first born son? Way too pricey for my blood...
I think your right. Thats probably about what my card can handle. So that card runs allright with the nvidia drivers huh? I've been wondering about the newer nvidia cards under linux.
Location: Moriarty, NM, USA about 100 yards form Rattle Snake Coutry
Distribution: Slackware , Ubuntu
Posts: 269
Rep:
No........it just cost half of my first born
(nice tax return this year.....what else would I spend it on?? a bigger badder computer for linux, of course)
And yes, Nvidia still has great support for linux. Which is why both home pc's run Nvidia graphics cards (6800GT & FX5700Ultra) and nForce chipsets (2 & 4).
NVIDIA 6600TE 128mb under 1400x1050
here's the kicker: was runnning this under kde with firefox open, azurues, xchat, gaim, and freeciv minimized. O did I say it was a laptop?
Last edited by bird603568; 06-17-2005 at 11:16 PM.
I have a Radeon 32MB DDR.
Setting the EnablePageFlip option doesn't seem to change much. Without it it's even slightly better (809.600 against 809.200).
All I need to do after altering the xorg.conf file is ending the current KDE session right?
Code:
Section "Device"
Identifier "** ATI Radeon (generic) [radeon]"
Driver "radeon"
# Option "EnablePageFlip" "on" #seems no improvement to me..
#VideoRam 32768
# Insert Clocks lines here if appropriate
EndSection
how come people are so into glxgears benchmarks. it is like one of the very few apps that even use opengl. once you get good glxgears benchmarks then what do u do with it. you are hardpressed to find and opengl app for linux. the only thing would be cedega, but why run a game in linux when you can run the same game in xp with much better performance?
What about native/ported Linux games? Yes, they are out there... I can only play Doom3 at 640x480 res on Linux or Windows. That's one of the main reasons why I'm pissed about my Frame Rates and my card in general... If I just played frozen bubble all the time, it wouldn't be too big of a deal...
Well theres ET, UT2004(which i pay and am not to good at), quake, doom and some others. I think far cry run on linux. Also there is scorched3d and multimedia apps that can use opengl.
I am curious to know if I have 3D acceleration. Granted, I'm not on the most current PC, with a current graphics card. I am running an AMDK-62 450MHz, 448MB of ram, dual boot, win2kpro and Slackware Linux, with an ATI Radeon7500 64MB card..
Code:
slackuser@slacker:~$ glxgears
1575 frames in 5.0 seconds = 315.000 FPS
1933 frames in 5.0 seconds = 386.600 FPS
1689 frames in 5.0 seconds = 337.800 FPS
1219 frames in 5.0 seconds = 243.800 FPS
1216 frames in 5.0 seconds = 243.200 FPS
1222 frames in 5.0 seconds = 244.400 FPS
1221 frames in 5.0 seconds = 244.200 FPS
1219 frames in 5.0 seconds = 243.800 FPS
2961 frames in 5.0 seconds = 592.200 FPS
3400 frames in 5.0 seconds = 680.000 FPS
3849 frames in 5.0 seconds = 769.800 FPS
1688 frames in 5.0 seconds = 337.600 FPS
1222 frames in 5.0 seconds = 244.400 FPS
1217 frames in 5.0 seconds = 243.400 FPS
slackuser@slacker:~$
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.