LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2013, 04:37 PM   #1
gapan
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Posts: 342

Rep: Reputation: 105Reputation: 105
[Request] Alpine 2.11


It seems that development of re-alpine, which is used right now for the slackware alpine packages, has also stalled. Alpine development is now continued here:

http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/release/

A lot of fixes and improvements have already been implemented. So, I'd like to see this included in the next slackware release.

Before anyone jumps: I know I can build a package myself using the slackbuild. In fact, I have. My point is that I think it would be a good idea for slackware to include this.
 
Old 10-13-2013, 08:02 AM   #2
rkfb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Guildford, England
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 282

Rep: Reputation: 37
It would be interesting to know how a package is selected for inclusion in a new release. I know I read a reply from Pat in another thread in which an upgraded package was requested where he said that the new package would just contain different bugs.

Whilst I do use alpine on a daily basis I am not such a power user that I really want 2.11, I am quite happy with 2.03 for what I use it for but obviously that doesn't mean others shouldn't want the upgrade.

Slackware is renowned for it's stability but with so many thousands for packages in every release how is it determined that upgraded package 'foo' is ready for inclusion? What gets 'foo' in to the next release? (or even as a patch/upgrade within the current release).
 
Old 10-13-2013, 01:49 PM   #3
jtsn
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Europe
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 695

Rep: Reputation: 277Reputation: 277Reputation: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkfb View Post
It would be interesting to know how a package is selected for inclusion in a new release. I know I read a reply from Pat in another thread in which an upgraded package was requested where he said that the new package would just contain different bugs.
That means, a distributor can do nothing about upstream software quality.

Quote:
Slackware is renowned for it's stability but with so many thousands for packages in every release how is it determined that upgraded package 'foo' is ready for inclusion? What gets 'foo' in to the next release? (or even as a patch/upgrade within the current release).
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Security issues usually justify an upgrade.
 
Old 10-15-2013, 03:25 AM   #4
gapan
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Posts: 342

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 105Reputation: 105
Thanks Pat!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Alpine with SMTP password 273 Linux - Software 6 05-15-2012 04:20 PM
passwordless alpine seaelf Linux - Software 4 11-02-2010 05:45 AM
Using Alpine in a command briealeida Linux - General 1 09-24-2009 03:56 AM
Bad Request Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand. vishnukumar Linux - Server 2 08-13-2009 12:56 AM
alpine mail johnh10000 Linux - Networking 0 06-18-2009 04:23 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration