ArchThis Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It is medium-hard to install. There is no gui to guide you through the entire thing. The base install just leaves you with a linux box booting to the command line. You need to edit 2 or 3 text files to get everything working and then use pacman to install x, kde, etc to your liking.
I followed the example given on the following review and it worked very well. I have since installed to 3 other computers.
Previously I had been using Mandrake and a little SuSE, Fedora, Debian (+ Mepis, Knoppix, Xandros,...) and Conectiva. I think it is easy to adapt to Arch due to the simplicity. I find it much easier to work with than fedora and I understand it a lot better than the Debian knock-offs I sometimes use.
One of the big advantages is the pacman repository is usually updated within a few hours of a package release. It is very leading edge. The repository is not as big as Debian, so for some things you might be on your own. If a problem comes up. it sometimes takes a day or two to get fixed, but you can usually revert to the previous package version in the mean time.
Before installing Archlinux, I had only used Redhat and had no previous experience of installing the more complicated distros, however I followed to documentation, and I now have a wonderful system running. It's really not that hard . Great distro.
That's what found when I installed Gentoo. Works great! Arch has had a romance about it, though, as its binary. That would give the cutting edge without the long compile times. I may be here asking questions soon...
The version is still 0.6, but one the packages (initscripts? whatever updates the /etc/rc.sysinit file) is showing 0.7, so it must be comming out very soon. The 'release' is just a set of package versions that will be included in the iso, so if you install 0.6 and then 'packman -Syu' to the newest stuff, you will have 99% exactly the same system if than if you wait for 0.7 and then do it.
I don't think it adds the windows partition to the boot options, check out the forum for the details:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.