LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


View Poll Results: Most Stable
Slackware 33 70.21%
Debian 14 29.79%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-11-2011, 06:39 PM   #1
asipper
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2011
Distribution: Fedora 17
Posts: 138

Rep: Reputation: 0
Debian vs Slackware Stability


These Distros are the Kings of stability and outdated packages. The argument could be made that even their unstable versions (current and sid) are outdated. I think Debian is more stable. As their outdated fork of firefox has to make it more stable.

Though this doesn't make Debian better

Last edited by asipper; 12-11-2011 at 06:40 PM.
 
Old 12-11-2011, 07:18 PM   #2
Cultist
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: Georgia
Distribution: Slackware64 14.2
Posts: 779

Rep: Reputation: 107Reputation: 107
Slackware isn't really that outdated in most cases. And no one forces you to keep older releases anyway - you're perfectly free to make a package for a newer program and update it whenever you feel like it. I regularly update several apps to the most current version (my Nvidia driver, Wine, my web browser, and a few others). This is a lot harder to do with Debian, if you want to keep a working system.
 
Old 12-11-2011, 07:20 PM   #3
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,311
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137
I use both and have for years.

I really must abstain, because I can't choose.
 
Old 12-12-2011, 04:18 AM   #4
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
If you run the latest version of Slackware, it is not outdated. You get regular updates as well, mostly for stability or security.

They are both quite stable. I vote for Slackware because I use it.
 
Old 12-12-2011, 04:56 AM   #5
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753

Rep: Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935
I cant really speak for slackware, I'm not a regular user. But in my experience, slackware and debian are both very stable.

Pity you didnt have a 'roughly the same for stability' option in the poll.

Quote:
Originally Posted by asipper View Post
These Distros are the Kings of stability and outdated packages.
Umm....try centOS/Red Hat for some really 'outdated' packages. Mind you, centOS/Red Hat has the same sort of stablity as slackware and debian stable, possibly they would be even more stable.
 
Old 12-12-2011, 05:09 AM   #6
asipper
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2011
Distribution: Fedora 17
Posts: 138

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Now that I think about it since Slackware is pretty vanilla that could also make it a lot more stable. And while Slackware has outdated packages there really not that outdate when a look at them.
 
Old 12-12-2011, 09:25 AM   #7
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,298
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
"Stable" can mean two things:
1: Only security updates. No new versions of software just for the sake of newness.
2: Doesn't fall over, break easily, explode.
One thing Slackware and Debian stable have in common: they are released WHEN THEY'RE READY. Unlike some other distros...
 
Old 12-12-2011, 09:27 AM   #8
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL View Post
One thing Slackware and Debian stable have in common: they are released WHEN THEY'RE READY. Unlike some other distros...
Actually, unlike most other distros, especially major distros.
 
Old 12-12-2011, 09:40 AM   #9
linus72
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: Slack14.2/Many
Posts: 5,573

Rep: Reputation: 470Reputation: 470Reputation: 470Reputation: 470Reputation: 470
Slackware -current is more stable than Debian stable IMHO
hands down
 
Old 12-12-2011, 10:00 AM   #10
Cedrik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,140

Rep: Reputation: 244Reputation: 244Reputation: 244
Stability depends mainly on how you use your system I think.
Sometimes, people come from windows OS, do everything as root etc..
 
Old 12-12-2011, 12:09 PM   #11
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by asipper View Post
These Distros are the Kings of stability and outdated packages.
???
I got the latest Firefox, Thunderbird and Seamonkey with the regular updates on Slackware, looks not outdated to me.
Anyways, I run Debian on my fileserver (still to lazy to change it to Slackware) and it runs 24/7 without any problems for months. I think the same will be true if I change it to Slackware. So your poll is missing an option here: Both are equally stable.
 
Old 12-12-2011, 08:29 PM   #12
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,311
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137
"Outdated" can be in the eye of the beholder. What one person might consider outdated because it's v. 5.6.x instead of v. 5.6.x+1 could be in another person's view considered "proven."

"Not the very latest" is not the same as obsolete.
 
Old 12-14-2011, 09:10 PM   #13
Knightron
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: openSUSE
Posts: 1,465
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 200Reputation: 200Reputation: 200
My two favorite distros. I use both, and cultist hit the nail on the head. Its a lot harder to upgrade packages in debian without breaking other things. I am torne but am going to have to give a vote to debian but only because of what I said above. By upgrading packages you risk bringing in a broken package, while debian has a repo set up with packages that are supposed to work well together. So while I sometimes I wish slack had dependency checking, if it did, then it would probably suffer the same limitation debian has.
 
Old 12-14-2011, 09:24 PM   #14
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,311
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137Reputation: 6137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knightron View Post
My two favorite distros.
What he said.

Between the two, I slightly prefer Slackware because I find it simpler and more straightforward as regards the organization of /etc, and I prefer Slackware's boot-to-the-command-line-by-default way of doing things. Indeed, I made my Debian boot to the command line most sweetly.

I may be influenced by having started with and learned on Slack. And those are matters of taste, not of stability.

It is interesting that two such very different distros could end up as our two favorites.
 
Old 12-15-2011, 09:10 PM   #15
FredGSanford
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: Mageia 7 - Debian 10 - Artix Linux
Posts: 1,142
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 207Reputation: 207Reputation: 207
Both. I started out using both after Caldera Linux broke me into linux.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Debian right for me? For speed, stability and using Skype. Chriswaterguy Linux - Distributions 7 01-31-2009 08:30 PM
stability of debian asparagus Linux - Newbie 8 12-23-2007 07:39 PM
RTLINUX-----stability on slackware 10.2 taher84 Slackware 1 09-15-2006 04:35 PM
Slackware current stability bpcw001 Slackware 9 11-30-2004 06:14 PM
slackware stability issue steyr Slackware 8 02-23-2004 04:26 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration