Linux - NewsThis forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Worries that the notorious Conficker worm will somehow rise up and devastate the Internet on April 1 are misplaced, security experts said Friday.
April 1 is the day that the worm is set to change the way it updates itself, moving to a system that is much harder to combat, but most security experts say that this will have little effect on most computer users' lives.
April 1 is what Conficker researchers are calling a trigger date, when the worm will switch the way it looks for software updates. The worm has already had several such trigger dates, including Jan. 1, none of which had any direct impact on IT operations, according to Phil Porras, a program director with SRI International who has studied the worm.
"Technically, we will see a new capability, but it complements a capability that already exists," Porras said. Conficker is currently using peer-to-peer file sharing to download updates, he added.
Gradually, the Conficker network will get updated, but this will take time, and nothing dramatic is expected to happen on April 1, according to Porras, Howard, and researchers at Secureworks and Panda Security.
"There is no clear evidence that the Conficker botnet will do anything dramatic," said Andre DiMino, cofounder of The Shadowserver Foundation, a volunteer security group. "It will change its domain usage to the larger pool and may attempt to drop another variant, but so far, that's about it."
Well darn, I was expecting it to do something dramatic, it looks like it will disappoint
I fear your day is coming, H- it's just a matter of when. What the experts don't know is what the authors are planning for this thing. Keep in mind, it may only take one 'update' to pass the instruction to wreak havoc, but they would need to select a later date to ensure all their bots are armed and ready. I think they may just be toying with the experts... at least for now.
lol, I dunno, you think it's possible ? How much damage could it cause ? It certainly looks like the creators are "evil geniuses" in a way. The way it works is truly something awesome, it's almost like the perfect worm.
It certainly looks like the creators are "evil geniuses" in a way. The way it works is truly something awesome, it's almost like the perfect worm.
Exactly.
All I can say is that I recall a few years ago when a 15 minute DDoS attack, generated by only a few thousand bots, booted Yahoo and affiliates offline for over 6 hours...
When you think of how much we have come to depend on computers...
Whoever created that Conficker botnet/worm went to a great deal of trouble, so they must intend to use it for something big. I think all those experts are indulging in wishful thinking, they haven't any more idea about it than we have.
When you think of how much we have come to depend on computers...
Whoever created that Conficker botnet/worm went to a great deal of trouble, so they must intend to use it for something big. I think all those experts are indulging in wishful thinking, they haven't any more idea about it than we have.
Well, they have decoded it, so they do know a little more than us.
But as far as what it will do, you are right. It's not in the code; it will have to come as an update. And to date, the botnet is over 10 million strong...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.