Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Do all distros provide a 64-bit operating environment? Considering all new hardware is 64-bit, it seems insane to always be loading 32-bit Operating Systems (welcome to the world of Microcrud).
I made the mistake of putting XP64 on my newest computer, only to discover that I could not do things like print or scan because no one wrote 64-bit drivers! Insanity! Most of the hardware web sites I went to either ignored the 64-bit question, or openly declared they had no plans to provide 64-bit support. This is surely one of the craziest concepts computer kind has ever come up with!
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Various using VMWare
Posts: 2,088
Rep:
Don't forget Debian.
I use the 64 bit versions of Debian Etch and Sid and have no problems. The only issue is Flash as well as some Firefox extensions, since they don't have 64bit versions. Everything else works flawlessly.
I use Xine with all the "bad" and "very-bad" gstreamer packages, along with Gnash, and I can probably view 90% of the video I encounter. Granted, I don't hang out at YouTube, etc. Sometimes it has artifacts and shadows, but it is improving. I keep a 32-bit partition handy in case I really need to see something, but I very rarely use it.
Probably all of them, considering I prefer xine over mplayer for a standaline video player.
Can't xine use ffmpeg? I removed w32codecs from my computer some time ago and I do not miss them. Ffmpeg + libquicktime covers everything for me, except for RealMedia - but we have Helix player. Mplayer uses ffmpeg to decode WM, BTW.
The x86_64 version of SuSE is biarch. You could uninstall the 64 bit version an install the 32 bit version:
./x86_64/xine-lib-32bit-1.1.2-39.x86_64.rpm
./x86_64/xine-ui-32bit-0.99.4-72.x86_64.rpm
The packman versions of these rpms would be needed to play DVDs and MP3s however.
Actually, the 32 bit version is /usr/bin/xine32, so you wouldn't need to uninstall the 64 bit version.
The Mozilla-Firefox package is 32 bit, so you would use the 32 bit plugins anyway.
Ok, guys, thanks a lot but you all stopped speaking English or even my concept of Computerese somewhere around the third post. I understand the basic concepts of LINUX but don't yet speak the language. Here are my druthers, in order of importance:
1) Not associated with Microsoft in any way.
2) Not Red Hat (screw me once, shame on you, screw me twice . . .)
3) 64-bit capable
4) Can use Firefox and Thunderbird (at least until I learn a newer, better browser and client)
5) Can use a Windows emulator (still have a couple of games to conquer)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.