LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices


View Poll Results: Which method of focus you like for your Window Manager?
Default X11 focus (follow focus) 8 28.57%
Sloppy Focus 4 14.29%
Follow focus + Autoraise 2 7.14%
Sloppy Focus + Autoraise 3 10.71%
Click To Focus 9 32.14%
Other 2 7.14%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-18-2017, 11:13 PM   #1
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Focus, Sloppy Focus, Autoraise or simply ClickToFocus?


Hello,

I am using CTWM, it is a great WM.

Do you prefer to use Focus, Sloppy Focus, Autoraise or simply ClickToFocus? Or maybe, there are other methods.

You can share your experiences on advantage/disavd. of these methods. Why you like one method in particularly?
 
Old 05-19-2017, 08:38 PM   #2
jailbait
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 8,337

Rep: Reputation: 548Reputation: 548Reputation: 548Reputation: 548Reputation: 548Reputation: 548
I find click to focus annoying. Otherwise I find the other types of focus all more or less OK. I voted for sloppy focus.

--------------------
Steve Stites

Last edited by jailbait; 05-19-2017 at 08:41 PM.
 
Old 05-20-2017, 01:09 AM   #3
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by jailbait View Post
I find click to focus annoying. Otherwise I find the other types of focus all more or less OK. I voted for sloppy focus.

--------------------
Steve Stites
I find click to focus annoying indeed. I find sloppy focus not easy to use if for instance you would like to close an application with key binding; not likely to work as expected.

Code:
# this will close the active win: wmctrl -c :ACTIVE:
" wmctrl -c :ACTIVE: "
    m:0x40 + c:25
    Mod4 + w
or ctwm
Code:
"w" = m          : window      : f.destroy
 
Old 05-20-2017, 08:38 PM   #4
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,321
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141
I prefer click-to-focus because I don't like application windows doing anything unless I tell them to.

Nobody else obeys me . . . . .

Last edited by frankbell; 05-20-2017 at 08:47 PM.
 
Old 05-29-2017, 08:09 AM   #5
jmccue
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: US
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 687
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380
I tend to bounce between "Follow focus + Autoraise" and "Sloppy Focus + Autoraise", no preference between the two. But I vastly prefer autoraise over any other method.

ctwm is cool, I used it a lot many years ago. I also noticed a new version was released, will need to give it a spin to see what changed

John
 
Old 05-29-2017, 10:43 AM   #6
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
I have a feeling that "Follow focus + Autoraise" is less efficient and productive than clicktofocus. "Follow focus + Autoraise" is more complex to handle, since if you come across a win it will autoraise, and it can hinder seeing the lower one (win).
 
Old 06-16-2017, 08:21 PM   #7
domo141
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
focus follows mouse or 'other'

Most of the time my (virtual) desktops are filled with emacs and urxvt windows -- moving
between those is most convenient by just moving mouse (NO CLICK!).

So, any 'focus follows mouse' option is good.

The 'other' option in title (and my vote) is 'focus follows keypress' which I was using last on
Amiga desktop (qmouse sunkey option). This option would be useful in other desktop environments
than X11, where mouse focus may be too aggressive.
 
Old 07-06-2017, 09:30 PM   #8
Rod J
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: New Zealand
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 27

Rep: Reputation: 7
I like "click to focus" as I sometimes want to scroll a non-focused window without making it focused.

I absolutely hate Windows method of NOT being able to scroll a non-focused window (at least every version of Windows I have tried, I assume Windows 10 follows the same pattern).

I use KDE/Kwin and did try for a while "focus follows mouse" but in the end I went back to "click to focus" as it just suits me best.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UI does not get focus csegau Linux - General 1 04-11-2013 02:22 PM
Mint 13 / Gnome - unable to set 'sloppy' focus without mous bringing window to top slimjim Linux - Desktop 0 12-12-2012 08:44 PM
JFrames and focus manolakis Programming 0 04-04-2009 11:32 AM
Focus on Click or anything else besides Focus on mouse. mellor Linux - Newbie 2 05-29-2008 11:31 AM
ubuntu 7.10: no more "sloppy focus"? Thoddy Ubuntu 2 10-24-2007 01:22 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration