Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
01-26-2013, 06:29 PM
|
#76
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Auckland, NZ
Distribution: openSUSE 12.2
Posts: 30
Rep:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Capabilities: <access denied>
In regard to the chipset;Never seen this before-
Why denied and in reference to what?
|
That just means that lspci was executed without root privileges.
Code:
sudo /sbin/lspci -vvv
|
|
|
|
01-26-2013, 06:36 PM
|
#77
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Auckland, NZ
Distribution: openSUSE 12.2
Posts: 30
Rep:
|
You have the EHCI (USB 2.0) hardware
Code:
00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #1 (rev 05) (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
Subsystem: Dell Device 04b0
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 23
Region 0: Memory at f7b07000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
and the XHCI (USB 3.0) hardware
Code:
0b:00.0 USB controller: Texas Instruments TUSB73x0 SuperSpeed USB 3.0 xHCI Host Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 30 [XHCI])
Subsystem: Dell Device 04b0
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
Region 0: Memory at f7900000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
Region 2: Memory at f7910000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: xhci_hcd
Quote:
|
Can I just force USB3.0 to work as 2.0 inside Linux?
|
It should have been as simple as unloading the xhci_hcd kernel module. This should leave the EHCI hardware active. (The same technique is often used for USB 2.0 HCI and associated USB 1.x HCI hardware, where the ehci_hcd driver is unloaded, leaving the uhci_hcd driver loaded.)
As an aside, are all the ports labelled USB 3.0, or do you have some USB 2.0-only ports on your laptop?
|
|
|
|
01-26-2013, 10:41 PM
|
#78
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware-current
Posts: 2,743
|
Quote:
|
As an aside, are all the ports labelled USB 3.0, or do you have some USB 2.0-only ports on your laptop?
|
+1 to that.
This hardware is looking a little quirky. According to the specs in the link http://www.cnet.com/laptops/dell-ins...-35127205.html the Dell N5110 has 2xUSB3.0, a USB2.0 and a USB2.0/eSATA port yet the OP reports only USB3.0 and a USB/eSATA port.
The output from lspci shows
Quote:
|
0b:00.0 USB controller: Texas Instruments SuperSpeed USB 3.0 xHCI Host Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 30 [XHCI])
|
yet other reports of lspci output from the Dell N5110 show
Quote:
|
0b:00.0 USB Controller [0c03]: NEC Corporation uPD720200 USB 3.0 Host Controller [1033:0194] (rev 04)
|
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/.../msg00417.html
and
Quote:
|
0b:00.0 USB controller: NEC Corporation uPD720200 USB 3.0 Host Controller (rev 04)
|
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=34157
The hardware on the OP's machine is likely using a TUSB7340, which should not be a problem, as it should be fully supported by the xhci-hcd kernel module.
It is also intriguing that the 3.7 kernel did not make a difference, although there have been a number of bug fixes to xhci since the 3.2 kernel that the OP originally reported using.
A very desperate suggestion would be to try booting using the 'nomsi' kernel parameter.
|
|
|
|
01-27-2013, 12:50 PM
|
#79
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Columbia , MD
Distribution: Fedora & Black Opal 64
Posts: 1,590
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferrari
That just means that lspci was executed without root privileges.
Code:
sudo /sbin/lspci -vvv
|
Thanks; thought it was something else-
|
|
|
|
01-27-2013, 12:57 PM
|
#80
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Columbia , MD
Distribution: Fedora & Black Opal 64
Posts: 1,590
Rep: 
|
Reading throught the output at the pastebin link-
EHCI is recognized and in regard to the kernel the echi_hcd is in use.
Looks good so far- (still reading)
|
|
|
|
01-27-2013, 01:02 PM
|
#81
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Columbia , MD
Distribution: Fedora & Black Opal 64
Posts: 1,590
Rep: 
|
Code:
it is also intriguing that the 3.7 kernel did not make a difference,
I thought so to Allend 
As I was taught that on a stable system users only install a new kernel if they need support for hardware
or to correct a performance problem.
|
|
|
|
01-27-2013, 02:39 PM
|
#83
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Columbia , MD
Distribution: Fedora & Black Opal 64
Posts: 1,590
Rep: 
|
Quote:
|
This hardware is looking a little quirky
|
Could that be because the firmware was modified or updated and is causing the device (scanner) to fail?
|
|
|
|
02-23-2013, 06:31 PM
|
#84
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Columbia , MD
Distribution: Fedora & Black Opal 64
Posts: 1,590
Rep: 
|
Over the next 2-3 weeks I'll be gathering information in regard to this thread and composing an article for the How To's in regard to using a Brother Printer along with the distro's Crunchbang, Ubuntu and Debian.
Clearly Brother printers work with Arch Linux considerably with ease but from this thread it's complex to say the least with the compatability of other distributions.
The article will provide instructions, how to's and commands to run to provide the user with what is needed to get the printer working.
Anyone that would like to advise, help construct or contribute to the article 'pm' me @Ztcoracat
Thanks to Allend and Ferrari
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|