LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > MEPIS
User Name
Password
MEPIS This forum is for the discussion of MEPIS Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2017, 02:25 AM   #1
beachboy2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Wild West Wales, UK
Distribution: Linux Mint 18 MATE, antiX-16.1, MX-16
Posts: 2,033
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 735Reputation: 735Reputation: 735Reputation: 735Reputation: 735Reputation: 735Reputation: 735
A glowing review of MX-16


DarkDuck has given a glowing review of MX-16 here:

http://linuxblog.darkduck.com/2017/0...-to-ideal.html
 
Old 02-20-2017, 01:36 PM   #2
Crippled
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2015
Distribution: MX-16
Posts: 160

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
MX-16 is outstanding. What I like best about MX-16 is I don't have to use the terminal.
 
Old 03-17-2017, 08:31 AM   #3
masinick
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Distribution: Debian, antiX, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and many others
Posts: 590
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 56
The "MEPIS family" of distributions (the "old" MEPIS, up until around late 2011 and early 2012, antiX, from 2006 to the present, and MX, derived from MEPIS by the antiX team with the assistance of the "MEPIS Lovers Community) have always had sensible and flexible software. Rarely do any of the systems, past, present, and hopefully future, have poor quality base installations. All of them are a sensible blend, offering slightly different configurations, depending on the specific instance and the target of each specific image, but they tend to be somewhat "lighter" in configuration than some of the more "popular" distributions, but I'd argue that the MEPIS family are well thought out, stable, and about as well-tested as they can be from a team of people that are relatively small in size, but wise in leveraging stable software sources and intelligent package choices along with solid system integration, resulting in efficient, effective, very usable systems.

MX-16 is excellent as a light to moderate weight general purpose system.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-17-2017, 09:22 AM   #4
rokytnji
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: AntiX 17 , ChromeOS
Posts: 4,965
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179Reputation: 2179
What He said. And He said.
 
  


Reply

Tags
antix, ideal, mepis, mx-16, review


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Home security gateway runs Linux, features glowing orb LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-24-2015 04:41 AM
Caps led is glowing while booting urajja Solaris / OpenSolaris 2 12-13-2007 04:24 AM
Hard disk LED keeps on glowing m.parthiban Linux - Hardware 3 07-25-2006 05:38 PM
Why is my USB Keyboard LEDs are not Glowing? pmrseshu Linux - Hardware 0 05-24-2005 01:15 AM
glowing review of open office titanium_geek Linux - News 5 05-13-2005 09:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration