Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
02-01-2013, 03:08 AM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 678
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza
yes i understood that but why are all other distros ext4 (to the best of my knowledge!). It seems Salix chose nfs for some reason... only thin gi can think of that it would be the same as windows (think that's nfs) and so would work perhaps better on a network?
|
No, you did not understand it. NFS is a file system that provides access to files on a server. This is not the same as the local disk file system, e.g. ext4.
The windows file system you refer to is NTFS.
|
|
|
|
02-01-2013, 03:11 AM
|
#17
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 35
Rep: 
|
edit: nvm, sycamorex and BroX were faster.
Last edited by elesmod; 02-01-2013 at 03:13 AM.
|
|
|
|
02-01-2013, 03:46 PM
|
#18
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroX
No, you did not understand it. NFS is a file system that provides access to files on a server. This is not the same as the local disk file system, e.g. ext4...
|
Ok thanks for correcting me. But why should Salix be nfs rather than ext4.
|
|
|
|
02-01-2013, 03:50 PM
|
#19
|
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,684
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza
Ok thanks for correcting me. But why should Salix be nfs rather than ext4.
|
Enough trolling and repeating yourself, whilst not listening to us. PROVE IT BY SHOWING THE URL WHERE IT SAYS SALIX USES NFS.
Geez.
Eric
|
|
|
4 members found this post helpful.
|
02-03-2013, 03:37 PM
|
#20
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
Enough trolling and repeating yourself, whilst not listening to us. PROVE IT BY SHOWING THE URL WHERE IT SAYS SALIX USES NFS.
Geez.
Eric
|
I didn't mean to type nfs.... i meant xfs. someone could have hinted like "nfs?"
Very strange considering everyone else uses ext4... and i think one distro uses reiserfs. xfs shouldn't be used for root i gather from a google but i don't know any more than that.
FYI - i look after my mother with Alzheimer's; change incontinence pads four times a day, wash her and feed her spoonful by spoonful. I've had a very stressful week but no bother i'll clear off and use another distro.
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 03:53 PM
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware-14.0 on a Lenovo T61 6457-4XG
Posts: 2,787
|
Of course we should stay tolerant to each other but... That's not always that easy. You have your problems and Eric has others (he was sick lately).
Back to the topic, my best advise would be to try Slackware.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
02-03-2013, 04:09 PM
|
#22
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Distribution: Slackware 64 Current
Posts: 264
Rep:
|
After 15 years of linux use, slackware is my distro of choice because of stability. Its nice that frequent updates come along for security etc as well.
You can use any file system you like. Theres plenty of software choice, i havent run into any dependency issues, but slackware, it deserves to be said again, is stable. You set it up and it just runs.
Software updates are dead simple with slackpkg and did i mention the stability? 
And im running current.
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 04:12 PM
|
#23
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,089
|
Quote:
|
I didn't mean to type nfs.... i meant xfs. someone could have hinted like "nfs?"
|
I guess the hints below were not sufficient:
Post 11:
Quote:
|
You must be mixing things up, as NFS stands for Network File System [wikipedia.org]
|
Post 14:
Quote:
|
Check again. What you imply is impossible.
|
Post 15:
Quote:
|
You mean XFS, not NFS. One letter and a hell of a difference
|
Post 16:
Quote:
|
No, you did not understand it. NFS is a file system that provides access to files on a server. This is not the same as the local disk file system, e.g. ext4.
|
To which, in Post 18, you respond:
Quote:
|
But why should Salix be nfs rather than ext4.
|
LOL
On a plus side, I think you'll never mix up the 2 terms.
Last edited by sycamorex; 02-03-2013 at 04:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 04:40 PM
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware-14.0 on a Lenovo T61 6457-4XG
Posts: 2,787
|
Back to question b)
I couldn't find an answer.
On the announcement for Salix XFCE 14.0, gapan aka George Vlahavas wrote :
Quote:
|
The default filesystem is now XFS, but as always, users doing a manual install, instead of selecting the autoinstall option, can choose between Btrfs, ext2/3/4, ReiserFS, JFS and XFS filesystems.
|
If you really want to know why he took that decision you would be better of asking him the question directly, either on Salix OS' forum or on their mailing list or IRC channel.
|
|
|
|
02-04-2013, 09:31 AM
|
#25
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Michigan
Distribution: Slackware 13.37, Puppy Linux, Vector Linux
Posts: 34
Rep:
|
I hear that....
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza
I didn't mean to type nfs.... i meant xfs. someone could have hinted like "nfs?"
Very strange considering everyone else uses ext4... and i think one distro uses reiserfs. xfs shouldn't be used for root i gather from a google but i don't know any more than that.
FYI - i look after my mother with Alzheimer's; change incontinence pads four times a day, wash her and feed her spoonful by spoonful. I've had a very stressful week but no bother i'll clear off and use another distro.
|
Reply: I hear you jessejazza. I take care of my mother too who has mild (thank god) Alzheimer's and the stress can screw with your concentration. I find myself doing stupid detail mistakes and I don't even know it until it creates a problem. Ding, ding, ding!! Hang in man.
|
|
|
|
02-04-2013, 12:12 PM
|
#26
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current, Slackware64 14
Posts: 265
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessejazza
I didn't mean to type nfs.... i meant xfs. someone could have hinted like "nfs?"
Very strange considering everyone else uses ext4... and i think one distro uses reiserfs. xfs shouldn't be used for root i gather from a google but i don't know any more than that.
FYI - i look after my mother with Alzheimer's; change incontinence pads four times a day, wash her and feed her spoonful by spoonful. I've had a very stressful week but no bother i'll clear off and use another distro.
|
If you've not cleared off yet, you should read the installation guide;
http://docs.slackware.com/slackware:install
and beginners guide on Slackdocs.
http://docs.slackware.com/slackware:beginners_guide
Most, if not all, of your questions will be answered that way.
Just make your home and / partitions ext4. I've tried different formats for different partitions in the past and it's not made any difference that I've noticed - my view is if you don't have to create a problem for yourself, then don't.
Good luck with your Mum, it's a tough life you must have. My wife is running the London marathon for a charity that operates in support of carers (her brother is unwell and her Mum has had to care for him for years) - my wife's proud to do her bit to help people who don't often get the public recognition they deserve, at least in the UK.
|
|
|
|
02-04-2013, 11:44 PM
|
#27
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Distribution: Slackware, Archlinux, CentOS
Posts: 175
Rep:
|
Aww man, I'm late to the party and didn't get to use my "I think your running Windows with NTFS" joke.
Anyways, hope you get it running okay.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|