Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Many years ago I followed the trend like a good little sheep and switched from lilo to grub. At the time I guess I was happy with it because I was 15 an the boot loader was a little prettier.
After grub 2.0 was released I decided I hated grub and it was needlessly complicated. I want back to lilo.
I've recently seen a lot of posts about this rEFind boot manager, which looks very visually impressive, however I can only imagine it being a giant headache.
So here is my question. I don't duel boot, but I recompile my kernel a lot so I generally have lots of kernels. Pretty screens are nice but 99% of the time I'd rather just boot and not even see the boot loader.
Lilo, has one command (once it's set up) and one config file which is generally only a few lines.
Can anyone give me a compelling argument why any other boot loader is better?
Personally, I'll take LILO over rEFind any day. IMO, Boot Manager without it being a Boot Loader also makes it useless. I don't need pretty, I need functional. I do prefer Grub to LILO, but only because I've gotten used to it. Either/or, long as it works.
I used lilo for a while, then switched to GRUB1 because it had more features and you have a command line when you boot just in case. Then I switched back to lilo when I moved to 64-bit because GRUB1 didn't support it. I'm still using lilo, but may move to GRUB2 if I see a real reason or benefit to it. GRUB2 has only become the default bootloader for many distros only recently.
I find it quite amusing that one of the main arguments against Lilo form Grub users was "But you have to run lilo after changing the configuration!" and now, with Grub 2 you have to do the same.
Anyways, I like those botloaders where I don't have to write a script for configuration: Lilo, Grub Legacy and Sys/Ext/Isolinux. I never looked into rEFINd, but I still hadn't the time to switch to UEFI on my systems.
Functional but simple enough that the commands are easy to remember. Yes it is agonizing having to type an extra four letter word every single time I upgrade my kernel... sigh..... but I suppose I can deal