SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I installed my slack 10 with da ext3, but later, desided 2 "jump" 2 reiser( i read about a new version... http://www.namesys.com/). Now i found a way to change my linux FS without reinstalling slack, if my experiment will have success, i'll wright sm guide =)
I am Using LVM and SuSE in a Prod environment.
I can enlarge my filesystem while my Oracle database is running !!!
(lvexpand + resize_reiserfs)
And it woks !
You cannot do that with ext3.
You have to unmount the ext3 filesystem (Stop database) , enlarge it, then mount it again.
I cannot to that in ther middle of the day
Until ext3 can do that, do even think to go ext3.
P.S. Unless you are willing to get up at 3am, to stop production machine to enlarge the ext3 filesystem.
Yes, as I mentioned early on in this thread, I tried it. I like it enough that I still have it. It seems to be a bit snappier with every day workstation performance and also with things like indexing. Updatedb goes a fair amount quicker on the new filesystem. The only comparison that I really have is Reiser v3.6, as that's what I've been using for the past 2 years prior to switching over to v4.
Its a bit tricky to get installed, though, as you can't simply upgrade to it, which means you have to create it from a kernel with the patch in it (as in another linux system, basically). I made a small partition and installed with the "mm" kernel and a base system. Then, I installed from there and chrooted into the new system and built it from the bottom up this time. But, you can follow the "Hard Disk Upgrade Mini-howto" at TLDP and copy your existing system to the new filesystem as well (which is what I have done previously).
I have tried reiserfs, but have had file corruption on 2 different pcs w/it.
Both of these happened under Suse.
When I switched last year to Slackware, I started using ext3 & it's been great.
I can't tell any speed difference, but then im not using it in a production enviroment.
Other than a firewall & a small web server at my work, I'm a desktop user.
Distribution: SuSE 9.2, Slackware Current, Arch Linux 0.7
Posts: 119
Rep:
XFS where I can use it, I think is very comprable to reiserFS and still only in it's incancy, it'll be blowing the socks off of ReiserFS in a few years or so... not that file system development is really that exciting
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.