LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Red Hat
User Name
Password
Red Hat This forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.

Notices

View Poll Results: Is it acceptable to deliver .RPM for a custom application that does not check dependencies?
Acceptable, users will not mind 0 0%
Not Acceptable 1 100.00%
Acceptable, but uncommon 0 0%
Acceptable, but users will complain 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 1. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-19-2012, 05:49 PM   #1
sashadolstar
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2012
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
RPM package - dependency checks


Hello,

My question is about dependency checks for the RPM package.

Using a third-party install generation tool, I created an .RPM installation package for my application.

There are several dependencies that are required to be present on user’s Linux OS for my application to run properly.

Specifically, “make”, and several “.so” libraries, like libgcc.so,libc.so, etc.

Not all of our users may have required dependencies installed prior to running my package installer.

This third-party installer tool that I used, generates RPM package, but does not include dependency checks.

As members of the Red Hat community, could you please comment on how a custom .RPM package without dependency checks may be received by users?

Is it acceptable enough to deliver .RPM for a custom application that does not check dependencies?

Or is it uncommon enough to ‘anger’ Linux users?

Thank you.

Last edited by sashadolstar; 10-19-2012 at 07:00 PM. Reason: title
 
Old 10-19-2012, 07:50 PM   #2
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 26,952
Blog Entries: 54

Rep: Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732Reputation: 2732
Quote:
Originally Posted by sashadolstar View Post
Using a third-party install generation tool, I created an .RPM installation package for my application.
Which tool exactly?


Quote:
Originally Posted by sashadolstar View Post
This third-party installer tool that I used, generates RPM package, but does not include dependency checks.
In short it produces crippled output that does not conform to any standard let alone RPM.


Quote:
Originally Posted by sashadolstar View Post
Is it acceptable enough to deliver .RPM for a custom application that does not check dependencies?
No it is not. And there are no valid reasons to do that.

What keeps you from generating RPM packages the way you should?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Install local .deb package with dependency resolution the_gripmaster Ubuntu 2 05-06-2012 09:39 AM
Is Aptitude capable of installing local .deb package and resolve dependency issue? Akhran Debian 3 07-06-2009 05:05 PM
Modify dependency in deb package Muffe Debian 2 08-26-2005 06:11 PM
dependency madness with .deb files zvonSully Debian 2 03-18-2005 06:27 AM
RPM in Slackware, dependency checks trigggl Linux - Software 6 01-20-2005 10:49 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration