LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Red Hat
User Name
Password
Red Hat This forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2004, 05:00 AM   #1
anonp
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2003
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
Redhat ES vs. WS


Hi all,

We are thinking about buying Redhat Enterprise Linux for our departmental server. However, we are not sure whether we should choose ES or WS. According to redhat, we should be choosing ES, but ES is very expensive. Does anyone whether the Kernel is configured differently between ES and WS? According to their online docs, it seems WS is just lacking some servers that we can easily install ourselves. Is it really worth the money to buy ES? Should we just use WS?

Thanks.
 
Old 12-06-2004, 06:44 AM   #2
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 74
If you don't want to pay anything at all for RHEL, you can use CentOS. It's a clone of RHEL, minus the Redhat branding.
 
Old 12-06-2004, 11:56 AM   #3
hkb33
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Raleigh NC
Distribution: Fedora / RHEL
Posts: 171

Rep: Reputation: 30
It might be worth it to take a look and see what support you'll get with ES vs WS:

http://www.redhat.com/support/service/sla/rhel3.html

Also, if you go and install some of those servers yourself on WS, then don't go crying to Red Hat if you run into problems with them. They'll politely decline to support your issue. If you want to save money by buying WS, then I can't stop you...just remember that you get what you pay for, and Red Hat will not budge on helping you out if your problem stems from a service that is not supported on WS.
 
Old 12-07-2004, 02:40 AM   #4
anonp
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2003
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks for the comments.

CentOS looks very interesting. I wonder whether it is truely as reliable as RHEL. I will research more into it.

We really don't care much about Red Hat's support. We just want to have a reasonably fast and extremely stable Linux OS to work with. Since we have been using Redhat before, we prefer to continue to use RedHat. Its just that ES is very expensive...
 
Old 12-07-2004, 07:15 AM   #5
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 74
Take a look at this review on newsforge.
 
Old 12-09-2004, 12:29 AM   #6
anonp
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2003
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
After doing some more research, I think we will go with Scientific Linux. It seems to be the most reliable one among the many RHL clones.

Has anyone been using them? Any comments?
 
Old 12-09-2004, 03:03 AM   #7
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 74
Never heard of Scientific Linux. I've heard of a few other RHEL clones but this is a first.
 
Old 12-09-2004, 10:54 PM   #8
anonp
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2003
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
This is the site for Scientific Linux. I guess it is mostly used in Europe. CERN is using them.

https://www.scientificlinux.org/

What are the other ones that you have heard of? I would like to also look into them before I make a decision. Thanks.
 
Old 12-11-2004, 11:05 PM   #9
aqoliveira
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Portugal
Distribution: /Red Hat/Fedora/Solaris
Posts: 620

Rep: Reputation: 30
Hi guys

Take look at this version http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/

tony
 
Old 12-12-2004, 10:54 AM   #10
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 199Reputation: 199
If you don't want Redhat support, go with CentOS. Its basically just Redhat ES stripped of any thing that says Redhat along with logo's. It uses the same installer and everything.

Our office is thinking of using it on servers that won't need actual support, since Redhat has hiked their prices on ES and such.. If they continue at this rate, we're probably gonna start experimenting with Suse, use it instead.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
display horizantly shifted for redhat 9.0, redhat enterprise and fedora core dudely Linux - Enterprise 3 08-13-2005 01:28 PM
display horizantly shifted for redhat 9.0, redhat enterprise and fedora core dudely Linux - Software 3 08-12-2005 11:18 AM
display horizantly shifted for redhat 9.0, redhat enterprise and fedora core dudely Linux - Newbie 1 08-11-2005 05:11 PM
redhat-config-packages error (thinks it is redhat and not fedora) qwijibow Fedora 3 12-17-2003 09:59 PM
installing samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm into RedHat 8 and RedHat 9 Linh Linux - Newbie 2 06-04-2003 06:50 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration