Red HatThis forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
There is less than 24 hours left to vote in the 2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards. Click here to go to the polls. Vote now and make sure your voice is heard!
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
yes, they'll be fine. they are, as you're probably aware, the very same packages, but without support or pretty pictures, at the binary level they really should just drop right in there. It can be a slippery slope here, in that if you do install yum, and do updates through it, you'll find that one day it will just become centos itself. (despite most underlying packages being the original rhel ones still) this is when the centos-release package gets installed, replacing the redhat-release one, with associated graphics and such. the system is still going to work as you expected of course...
Looking through the yum setup it's a bit complicated for our needs/skill
I'd rather (at the moment) just update the files that need to be upgraded in order to install HP SIM, so that's rpm-build and rpm-devel - should I be able to get those rpms from the mirrors - or will I need to download the isos?
And am I better getting the kernel source from kernel.org? We're running 2.6.9-42 I think
yeah those should be available without much problem. you would want to take a LOT of care to make sure you have the exact same version. if you update something like RPM itself, you'll very often spiral off into a vast range of dependencies. personally i'd just be googling for the rpm sub version (which is consistent across to centos)
yes, but you should also be fine to just install the centos-release for that version, and the matching centos yum repos data (not sure what the package name actually is there.. *might* be the release file again actually) and do a "yum update" and off it'll go.