LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Red Hat
User Name
Password
Red Hat This forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-25-2004, 11:45 PM   #1
imsajjadali
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Faisalabad-Pakistan
Distribution: Red Hat Linux 2.1 Advance Server
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: 15
Kernel Updation?


I have updated all kernel files EXCLUDING headers and source...what is importance of these files...if I did not update these files..is there any harm?
 
Old 01-26-2004, 12:31 AM   #2
adz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Debian, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,713

Rep: Reputation: 53
What other kernel files are there? Are you talking about the kernel itself?
 
Old 01-26-2004, 12:42 AM   #3
imsajjadali
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Faisalabad-Pakistan
Distribution: Red Hat Linux 2.1 Advance Server
Posts: 102

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
yes I am talking about kernel itself. Actually I have updated the kernel from kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.3 to kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.35. During updation I have updated the following files
kernel-summit-2.4.9-e.8.i686.rpm
kernel-smp-2.4.9-e.8.i686.rpm
kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.8.i686.rpm
kernel-doc-2.4.9-e.8.i386.rpm
kernel-debug-2.4.9-e.8.i686.rpm
kernel-BOOT-2.4.9-e.8.i386.rpm
kernel-2.4.9-e.8.i686.rpm
The only files which I have not updated are the following
Kernel-source-2.4.9-e.8.i386.rpm
kernel-headers-2.4.9-e.8.i386.rpm

My question is: are these files must required to update kernel?
 
Old 01-26-2004, 12:54 AM   #4
adz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Debian, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,713

Rep: Reputation: 53
The first three look like three different kernels. In other words, the last one you installed is the one you're probably running. To double check which kernel version you're running type uname -r.

That was more by-the-by. As for source, you only need that if you plan to compile a kernel yourself at some stage (I would recommend this) and the headers you'll need if you wish to compile something against your current kernel like a graphics driver.
 
Old 01-26-2004, 01:10 AM   #5
imsajjadali
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Faisalabad-Pakistan
Distribution: Red Hat Linux 2.1 Advance Server
Posts: 102

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
First of all thanks for so quick response.

sorry, it is typing mistake ..plz review my message again
yes I am talking about kernel itself. Actually I have updated the kernel from kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.3 to kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.35. During updation I have updated the following files
kernel-summit-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
kernel-smp-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
kernel-doc-2.4.9-e.35.i386.rpm
kernel-debug-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
kernel-BOOT-2.4.9-e.35.i386.rpm
kernel-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
The only files which I have not updated are the following
Kernel-source-2.4.9-e.35.i386.rpm
kernel-headers-2.4.9-e.35.i386.rpm

I have not update source/headers files...Can my system work ok without these files or there is any harm..please reply in detail.

__________________
Sajjad
 
Old 01-26-2004, 03:07 AM   #6
adz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Debian, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,713

Rep: Reputation: 53
Quote:
sorry, it is typing mistake ..plz review my message again
yes I am talking about kernel itself. Actually I have updated the kernel from kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.3 to kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.35. During updation I have updated the following files
No I understood you just fine. I was just saying that I thought each of the first three files was a separate kernel.

Quote:
I have not update source/headers files...Can my system work ok without these files or there is any harm..please reply in detail.
I've already answered that question. Reread the second paragraph of my previous post.
 
Old 01-26-2004, 03:20 AM   #7
imsajjadali
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Faisalabad-Pakistan
Distribution: Red Hat Linux 2.1 Advance Server
Posts: 102

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
sorry for disturbing again..last thing I want to know
Quote:
No I understood you just fine. I was just saying that I thought each of the first three files was a separate kernel.
kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm

You mean to update kernel as enterprise I only need to update
kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm and not need the following files to update:
kernel-summit-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
kernel-smp-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
 
Old 01-26-2004, 05:05 AM   #8
adz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Debian, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,713

Rep: Reputation: 53
Most probably yes. I can't see how you would bundle a kernel into more than one package. Like I said before, type uname -r at the prompt to see which kernel you're running.
 
Old 01-26-2004, 05:33 AM   #9
imsajjadali
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Faisalabad-Pakistan
Distribution: Red Hat Linux 2.1 Advance Server
Posts: 102

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
thanks Mr. ADZ
Acutauly I have installed the following files
kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
kernel-summit-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
kernel-smp-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
and during system booting I have to selected the 2.4.9-e.35enterprise from above three kernel...is it ok.
 
Old 01-26-2004, 06:45 AM   #10
adz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Debian, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,713

Rep: Reputation: 53
Yes that's OK as long as it's OK with you. You will not have any ill effects from this other than having to select the appropriate kernel at boot time.
 
Old 01-26-2004, 07:27 AM   #11
imsajjadali
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Faisalabad-Pakistan
Distribution: Red Hat Linux 2.1 Advance Server
Posts: 102

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
it mean next time I only need to update the following one file to update kernel
kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.35.i686.rpm
 
Old 01-26-2004, 07:12 PM   #12
adz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Debian, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,713

Rep: Reputation: 53
Well, in short, yes. But I would recommend compiling you own (newer) kernel at some stage
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kernel 2.4 in Zipslack (Waring: unable to open an initial console | Kernel Panic...) kurtamos Linux - General 2 05-10-2006 12:58 PM
Kernel-Patch Debian Logo 2.6.2 not correctly working for custom kernel 2.6.11 smp deepclutch Debian 3 06-27-2005 03:59 AM
kernel panic: try passing init= option to kernel...installation with Red Hat 9 kergen Linux - Hardware 1 09-30-2004 03:28 AM
kernel memory + slabinfo.. + possible reasons for kernel space allocation failures!! premenjit Linux - Software 1 09-28-2004 04:13 AM
what is the Process of frame buffer updation id4u_ravi Linux - General 0 06-16-2004 11:36 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Red Hat

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration