| Puppy This forum is for the discussion of Puppy Linux. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
07-26-2011, 05:56 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Rep: 
|
Can I make a 'Limited' account for safer web browsing?(Like I do in Windows?)
I am a real Newbie to Puppy and to Linux in general. Can I make a 'Limited' account with a password for safer web browsing?(Like I always do in Windows?) I don't feel safe using my primary account with unlimited power to make changes to the system. I am booting from a USB flash drive into Puppy 5.2.5 on several PCs. I have extra space on the USB.
|
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 06:16 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,497
|
No reason why not ... just make sure the account isn't in any extra groups like wheel and that there's nothing stupid in /etc/sudoers like:
Code:
%users ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
07-26-2011, 06:32 PM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Thank you
Thank you kbp! Solved! Ash2591
|
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 07:25 PM
|
#4
|
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,526
|
No one should ever be logged on as a superuser for the most part. You in your daily use should be logged on as the lowest user. Your feeling about another person is misplaced. Your actions cause a bigger security hole.
|
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 07:31 PM
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,142
|
I wonder if that really works. Since Puppy is not a distribution with multi-user support you are always logged in as root. Does it really work to create a limited user and work with that on Puppy?
|
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 07:57 PM
|
#6
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Sep 2009
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 6,443
|
Unlike puppy, almost all other distros do everything from a limited account.
|
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 08:02 PM
|
#7
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,142
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358
Unlike puppy, almost all other distros do everything from a limited account.
|
I know, but since the OP states that he is using Puppy, and Puppy does not support a multi-user setting, I wonder if that actually works as intended. If any one can give me some information on that I would really appreciate that.
|
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 08:56 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Distribution: looking at VectorLinux 6.0 Light, PCLinuxOS phoenix
Posts: 195
Rep: 
|
here's the latest that i'm aware of
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=69853
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtop...=546626#546626
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtop...=546698#546698
Quote:
Typically, we seem to betrying to invent a new way of handling multiple users on an OS that was designed to do that from the very beginning. The whole thing of running as root by default could have been implemeted very simply -with a quick edit of just a couple files.
Instead, since great effort was spent to create a root-only distro, by having to hack around on lots of things, we've made it very difficult to re-implement proper multi-user capability.
The proper thing to do here is to get rid of all the hacks and omissions which made puppy root-only in the first place. Then we'd have something which would be easily configurable to run as root-only, multi-user, as a proper server or whatever one wanted.
The idea that root and fido should share a home directory is absolutely preposterous.
|
Last edited by jonyo; 07-28-2011 at 09:22 AM.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
07-28-2011, 09:12 AM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 60
Rep:
|
Quote:
|
Unlike puppy, almost all other distros do everything from a limited account.
|
Yes, but unlike all other distros Puppy can run on a frugal installation where you can have several (identical) pupsave files for different purposes. That way you get the security of a limited access and the convenience of working as root.
|
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 10:10 AM
|
#10
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,142
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wu2wei
That way you get the security of a limited access
|
Can you explain that to me? If someone can access my system because of a browser exploit he has root rights on Puppy and user-rights on any other distro. How is that secure?
|
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 03:55 PM
|
#11
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
I am getting more confused!
Hi, I do appreciate all the ideas, but I am getting more confused! Like I said, I am a Puppy Newbie. Thanks, Ash
|
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 04:28 PM
|
#12
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Sep 2009
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 6,443
|
Especially as a newbie, maybe it would be better for you to switch to a more standard Linux distro?
|
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 04:53 PM
|
#13
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,142
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358
Especially as a newbie, maybe it would be better for you to switch to a more standard Linux distro?
|
I second that, Puppy is a good distro, but I wouldn't recommend it for newbies.
|
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 05:49 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,497
|
OP: appologies for the misleading advice earlier, I didn't realise that Puppy went to such great lengths to operate as single user/root only. You'll probably be better off trying a different distro.
|
|
|
|
07-29-2011, 09:39 AM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Distribution: looking at VectorLinux 6.0 Light, PCLinuxOS phoenix
Posts: 195
Rep: 
|
funny, here is part of the puppy mission statement
http://puppylib.open-lib.net/puppy.html
Quote:
Puppy will be extremely friendly for Linux newbies
Puppy will have all the applications needed for daily use
Puppy will just work, no hassles
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|