thund3rstruck |
05-01-2012 08:53 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sergei Steshenko
(Post 4664709)
I suggest to read http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-l.../msg00016.html thread.
I think that objectively Qt is a better choice - even though I'm using gtk+ in its Perl bindings form - I needed Perl bindings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan
(Post 4664903)
It is. It's significantly less verbose than GTK.
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong but in order to use Qt you have to have all the KDE dependencies? Those dependencies are huge and take a long time to download right? I mean I don't use Amarok or K3b anymore because they require all that KDE stuff.
This all reminds me of Java on the desktop. My organization went to .NET specifically because (you can depend on it being on the machine as part of the operating system) and if you have to depend on some sys-admin to ensure the right version of J2EE is installed on all the target machines then you can basically forget it because that's not worth the hassle.
My goal is to ensure that any applications I might develop on the Linux platform will run on the widest range of computers with the least amount of external dependencies. It seems silly that there isn't a standard across all Linux/GNU platforms to at least ship a common set of libraries (or a common UI framework) that is guaranteed to be on the machines.
Of course, there will always be utility distributions like Puppy and such that are special use but those would be special cases.
|