Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Nuke
I don't need sarcasm.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wje_lq
Good, because I wasn't giving you any.
|
As an unbiased (I think) observer, I'd like to take the OP's side here (but see comment at end of post). "let me google that for you" is a cute tool and in many forum threads it is a perfect answer, but:
Quote:
the eighth entry on the results screen points to a place where you can
|
I expect the OP is a lot happier with that answer. He might be even happier with
http://www.ka9q.net/code/cpuid/
Sometimes the google results take some expertise to use. The eighth entry !!? I clicked on a few of those entries, including the eighth and it wasn't obvious whether any one of them was a right or wrong place to start digging for this answer.
With the eighth one it wasn't all that obvious how to get the source code. (The link I just posted is the source code).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Nuke
My main concern is making it work for 64-bit compilation,
|
I can't tell quickly whether that source code meets that concern. I didn't notice anything about that on the pages leading to the source code.
Mr_Nuke, I hope wje_lq's second answer and/or my clarifications help you.
wje_lq, once you went to the trouble of doing the google for him and apparently verifying that one of the results (the eighth) seems to be useful, it would have been nice to copy that link into your post.
I think a bare "let me google that for you" is appropriate only when any twit can spot the good results from the first page of google results. I almost know the material of this question myself and I couldn't spot the good results.
Mr_Nuke, I'd also like to refer you to my opposite take on a similar situation at
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...55#post3448655
When you are the one asking for help, you would be well advised to be more polite than the people offering help.