ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Most kernels are written in low level programming languages such as C and Assembly. Would it be possible to write a kernel in a high level language such as Python? Many high-level languages are themselves written in C.
No. Python is an interpreted language, therefore nothing can interpret it until a system is up and running and the python interpreter is available. In this scenario a kernel couldn't ever boot up!
No. Python is an interpreted language, therefore nothing can interpret it until a system is up and running and the python interpreter is available. In this scenario a kernel couldn't ever boot up!
Hmm, very good point!
I'm aware that this proposition would be cumbersome and unnecessarily complicated, but bear with me. What about a "two-part" OS-- a small, simple, mini-OS to get the interpreter up and running, and then booting up the high-level kernel?
I'm aware that this proposition would be cumbersome and unnecessarily complicated, but bear with me. What about a "two-part" OS-- a small, simple, mini-OS to get the interpreter up and running, and then booting up the high-level kernel?
I guess that's possible, but many of the things an OS needs to do are almost right down to the CPU's inner workings, even lower-level than C.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
