LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming
User Name
Password
Programming This forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2007, 03:03 PM   #1
manolakis
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: xubuntu
Posts: 376

Rep: Reputation: 30
Haskell, OCaml, Scheme, Erlang, Perl, Python, Ruby


Hi there
Does anybody know what the following languages can do better than Java or what generally are useful for?
Quote:
Haskell, OCaml, Scheme, Erlang, Perl, Python, Ruby
Thanks
 
Old 08-05-2007, 03:08 PM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,384

Rep: Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963
please forgive me if i'm reading this out of context, but this really sounds like homework or such like. if you need to know a bit about each of these languages, then a google search really is one of the bests ways to get that overview. in actual fact you'd probably need to back up to different types of language, declarative, functional etc... as they work in such different ways a compare and contrast between languages of types can become very hard.
 
Old 08-05-2007, 11:46 PM   #3
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853

Rep: Reputation: 65
This is nothing a moderately quick Wikipedia search can help you with.

Perl is used mostly for parsing data (well, that's what its original purpose was).
Python - I see it as a "BASIC for UNIX" type of language, but much more sophisticated.
Scheme is a Lisp derivative (like Common Lisp), symbolic computation and AI programming with a heavy mathematical inclination.
Ruby, I see, aims to be an "everything is an object" type interpreted language.

I don't know what Haskell, OCaml and Erlang are reserved for, though.
 
Old 08-06-2007, 02:25 AM   #4
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,384

Rep: Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963
Quote:
Python - I see it as a "BASIC for UNIX" type of language, but much more sophisticated.
wtf? what planet are you from?? i can't see any reason to ever compare the two languages, they are about as different as modern languages get from each other.
 
Old 08-06-2007, 05:45 AM   #5
bigearsbilly
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: england
Distribution: FreeBSD, Debian, Mint, Puppy
Posts: 3,287

Rep: Reputation: 173Reputation: 173
agreed,
apart from implying BASIC is a modern language
 
Old 08-06-2007, 06:06 AM   #6
makyo
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Saint Paul, MN, USA
Distribution: {Free,Open}BSD, CentOS, Debian, Fedora, Solaris, SuSE
Posts: 718

Rep: Reputation: 72
Hi.

I have found this general article to be useful http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compari...ming_languages

It contains links to more specific articles, and has a number of additional references ... cheers, makyo
 
Old 08-06-2007, 11:31 AM   #7
Defunct
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Oregon
Distribution: Kubuntu but searching for something permanent
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
I know that both Haskell and OCaml are functional programming languages.

Both Scheme and Ruby are multi paradigm, with Scheme tending more towards functional programming.

The "series of tubes" is a good way to find this stuff out and is faster than asking on a forum.
 
Old 08-06-2007, 09:56 PM   #8
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853

Rep: Reputation: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by acid_kewpie
wtf? what planet are you from?? i can't see any reason to ever compare the two languages, they are about as different as modern languages get from each other.
Yikes - sorry. I just likened it to BASIC due to the syntax, and variable declaration method (dynamic typecasting, instead of static type declaration). That's how I saw Python as acting when I first used it.

I'm sorry if I offended you to any great degree.
I take it back.

Last edited by indienick; 08-06-2007 at 09:58 PM.
 
Old 08-06-2007, 10:10 PM   #9
taylor_venable
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Indiana, USA
Distribution: OpenBSD, Ubuntu
Posts: 892

Rep: Reputation: 40
It's my sig!

Anyway, let me sum it up briefly, but there's really much more to it than this. These are among my favorite languages.

Haskell is purely functional, but with the power of monads becomes useful for real programming tasks. A lot of mathematical programs are very easy with Haskell, that's why I use it for work on Project Euler.

Objective Caml brings easier capability to functional programming, like the use of references and (kind-of) objects. And it's super fast, even faster than C++ in some cases. Also, the debugger can step forward AND backward through execution.

Scheme is a nice, smallish language. Very simple, and as such it makes learning some of the core concepts of computing science simplistic. Also, it has a very bare implementation of continuations and guarantees tail recursion.

Erlang combines awesome functional features with awesome concurrency features. Start several Erlang processes (they're like threads) on several CPUs or on several machines, then have them talk to each other transparently over the network. Messages are composed of Erlang objects, so there's no encoding / decoding.

Perl is just great for any kind of quick text processing. Truly flexible to the last.

Python is nice and flexible in an object-oriented way. Good for programming in the extremely large, as far as object organization goes, but a tad on the slow side. It's like an extremely liberating Java.

Ruby is very intuitive and easy to write. Plus, it's awesome for metaprogramming, even moreso than Python. Almost the best of both Perl and Python, except Python has a more transparent object model.

Click on the links to get more information about any of these languages. They might not all appeal to you, but I myself am somewhat of a computer linguist. Learning multiple languages can never hurt, and often discovering something about a new language will reveal a new truth about your favorite and most commonly used one.

Happy hacking!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Perl vs. Ruby vs. Python vargadanis Programming 53 12-31-2010 12:37 PM
Live CD distros with Python and Ruby Killswitch99 Linux - Newbie 3 05-28-2007 12:49 PM
LXer: Using Python, Ruby, and Web services LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-11-2007 06:16 AM
Which of theese three to begin with? C++/Python/Ruby seimour Programming 11 03-07-2007 02:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration