Functional Programming and OOP
Hello.
Is it true that OOP will be die because of Functional programming? Are you agree? |
Quote:
Best regards, HMW |
Haskell is a dog
|
Quote:
lisp is a speech impediment |
Just spend some money working as I have done for the past 22 years or so (at sundialservices.com), working almost exclusively on existing, "legacy," systems.
This is the software that makes a company money, without which it will not make money. And it is many years old, worked on by a revolving-door of prior programmers with varying levels of experience. You won't believe in "silver bullets" then. Methodologies with their silly yellow notes ... language junkies ... nor those who believe (based on their academic research) that they've found the holy grail. |
functional programming has been around forever.
C is the language of the future. |
Quote:
|
Back in my day we called it Prodcedural Programming,. and C++ was C with classes. OOP is not going anywhere btw - java java java.
|
procedural programming is not the same thing at all as functional programming.
|
Didnt say it was. I was talking about C in reply to 'C is the language of the future' comment you made.
|
key doke. I sit corrected :)
|
No prob. I was vague. My fault.
|
What is the future of programming? How about Ruby?
|
Quote:
Edit: version 3, not 2 |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 PM. |