ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I was just wondering what your opinions were on this. I have heard that it is a good idea to Learn C before C++. But I also have heard from other sources that it is not a good idea to learn C before C++.
If you are going to program in C, learn C. If you are going to program in C++, learn C++. Having learned C first, it was easy for me to pick up C++, but it still took me a long time (as if starting from scratch) to program in a "real" OO way, as opposed to C run through the C++ compiler.
If your interest lies in language design, by all means learn C as well, plus Objective C, Java, and C#.
Having learned object - oriented programming first, I'd say it doesn't matter because every project is different, so if it were me, I learned OO first then ventured to structured programming. It's really up to your own purposes.
Learning C first or C++ first, you will end up learning C.
Why? Because real C++ means "class" and "objects" and it's a real complex object oriented programming which is not really appropriate for the beginners.
No C++ beginners' books or course teach you that real C++ concepts straight away. They will teach you the procedure C feature of the C++ first.
So even If you learn C++ first,(learning by reading books or taking a course), you will learn only the C feature of the C++, meaning it's the same as C.
So no matter which one you start learning C or C++, you will actually start learning C.
Last edited by moeminhtun; 10-30-2003 at 12:32 AM.
Originally posted by oopicmaster Because of the mistakes made by the designers of C++ you cant learn C++ without learning a little C.
Absolutly righ. They made a mistake by making C++ to be compatible with C. The result is that half object-oriented badly designed language. Java designers corrected this mistake by making the Java very clean and pure object oriented and that end up to be incredibly well designed language.
Last edited by moeminhtun; 10-30-2003 at 12:37 AM.
I Think that the main problem that occurred with C++ was that it came about as a language, but there were no standards of how to use it. Java on the otherhand came in to being with standards of how it is is to be used. Good C++ coders can design apps that are just as object oriented as Java code but, it isnt a requirement by any standards to do so.
Then, there were different vendors supplying different proprietary class libraries (STL, MFC, Roguewave, Home rolled, Database access libraries, etc) , in an attempt to compensate for the deficiencies in the language and the lack of standards...
I wouldnt spend any time learning C, unless I planned on doing lowlevel coding, at the OS Level, or Embedded systems development where memory is very limited.
There are actually some text for teaching C++ which does not introduce procedural programming (at least one text anyway). I don't know its name, but I remember reading that a university was using it as course material for newbs and according to the article, it was a successful approach at getting the students to enter the OO paradigm. I makes good sense to me, if you can structure your text well and introduce the concepts in a well thought out manner with out getting to complex up front.
I wish I could remember the text's name...
But I do agree that learning C++ first would be to your benefit, but generally in doing so, you will be exposed to some C (many texts I've seen often have contrasts to C )
Location: At a tea party with Alice in Wonderland.
Distribution: Fedora 7
Personally, I learned java first. Then I picked up some C++. Though I haven't done much programming in it , the migration was fairly painless. I've looked at C as well, and to me, C++ is easier than C.