ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I've been programming for a few years and I never knew that 'extended ascii' was so ambiguous, but now I've done some reading I realise there is no such thing.
When I say extended ascii, I guess I mean IBM DOS extended ascii. Have a look at
Lol, I see... For me this is just ascii (but I don't program for a few years, just the last one)
I would say again that the display of these chars depends of the terminal font, eg if the char
won't display, it may means that this char is not built in the font.
I've been reading something about codepage. That might have something to do with it. bash has something there about 127, I'm just doing a script to find out what it is, I'll let you know.
Well nothing too good. Below is a list of the ascii code outputs through printf from 0 to 400. The left column is the octal code, the right is the output. Hope this helps someone out, because it helped me squat
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.