Other *NIXThis forum is for the discussion of any UNIX platform that does not have its own forum. Examples would include HP-UX, IRIX, Darwin, Tru64 and OS X.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
there have been some articles regarding vms and its uptime being in years, and its security being very good.
how would one compare it to *nix , i know openvms uses POSIX to comply with *nix?
it uses x-windows for server-user gui.
threre is more than user and root, although *nix has groups that can be used in a simlar way.
Surely *nix servers have been up for years too without rebooting.
vms was coded in Bliss, opposed to C for *nix, i would appreaciate the diffrences.
the hackers convention a few years back is always used as vms starting point regarding security, apparently the hackers did not know the system before there tried hacking it, which does not conclude a fair trial, also a lot os daemons were not on, in regarding the *nix system, which they had used and knew security vunerabilities.
Hi I'm also very interested in OpenVMS. I have been trying very hard, with no success, to get a hobbyist license. I have an alpha that I would like to put it on. If you email the fellow on this page he will promptly (and very politely I might add) get you a shell account on a large vax machine in his basement.
The fact that admins for OpenVMS feel comfortable giving out shell accounts gives me a very warm fuzzy feeling about OpenVMS.
If you figure out how to get the HP hobbyist license please post back.
Ya I went to that site and it was getting caught on step 3-- for a couple of weeks. It's weird I check every day and today-- I can get past step 3. I'm very excited and cannot wait to get home. It will probably be a few weeks before I will be able to get something up and running. My alpha is a basket case.
I will try to remember to post back when I do get it up and running.
on a x86 box , it may be possible to emulate a dec alpha using simics, bochs, vmware or any other cpu emulator and install vms that way, it would proberly run very slowly , being the main disadvantage to native architecture.
It was just a thought i had.
I have run VMS VIA emulator in Linux.
For a time there was a commercial company that offered a minimal version of their emulator but no longer do so because of software piracy concerns. The open source SIMH runs VMS great. In both cases the VAX version, not the Alpha.
To get a hobbyist license I had to apply for the free basic membership with Encompass then using that membership number apply for the hobbyist license.
comp.os.vms is a good source of VMS info.
If I had a chance to aquire a VAX really cheap I would.