| MEPIS This forum is for the discussion of MEPIS Linux. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
06-12-2005, 02:35 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 115
Rep:
|
"smart" or "default" upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1?
How did 'the rest of you' upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1. Did you do a Synaptic 'smart' upgrade (equates to a 'dist-upgrade' in apt-get) or did you do a 'default' upgrade? Seems to be some confusion in the other Mepis boards so I thought I'd toss it out here to see what has worked for others.
I've got about 30 pgms and libs being held back by Synaptic and wonder if it is safe to do the 'smart upgrade.'
Thanks,
ANC
|
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 03:05 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: Orlando, Fl
Distribution: ArchLinux (Can use any distro though)
Posts: 231
Rep:
|
Ive talked with LordDavon about this in the past, the official policy is to not do any upgrading outside of the single MEPIS repo. However, should you wish to you can do either type of upgrade. You are not promised all programs will work if you do upgrades.
-mos
|
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 03:56 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 115
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by mos
Ive talked with LordDavon about this in the past, the official policy is to not do any upgrading outside of the single MEPIS repo. However, should you wish to you can do either type of upgrade. You are not promised all programs will work if you do upgrades.
-mos
|
Hmmm. Sort of spoils the 'fun' of having a fantastic system like apt-get. I assume you are not saying that we have to wait for an official version of Mepis Firefox before we can upgrade to it. And I assume you are saying that Mepis is NOT going to have its own set of packages (like Ubuntu seems to have.)
I guess the Mepis folks don't want us to ugrade since they 'turned off' the Debian repos in the apt-get .list and that what you are telling us is 'upgrade at your own risk.'
Al C.
|
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 04:20 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: Orlando, Fl
Distribution: ArchLinux (Can use any distro though)
Posts: 231
Rep:
|
no there wont be a mepis specific set of packages that debian packages, however, you are everything is supposed to work 'out of the box' if you upgrade you take it into your own hands and he cant be held responsible when stuff breaks. btw, nothing is terribly worng with smart upgrades if your familiar with apt and know how to fix problems with it
|
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 05:02 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: antiX using fluxbox, icewm, i3 and wmii
Posts: 275
Rep:
|
acanton
It is not just a Mepis problem. Anyone using a distro that is heavily dependant on Debian (as you know Mepis is 90%+ debian and it wants to stay that way - unlike Ubuntu with its own packages) will just have to be patient when it comes to upgrading at the moment until Debian gets things sorted out.
Mepis 3.4 is supposed to be the one with "major" changes, ie KDE 3.4, possibly xorg, blah blah blah.
Relax - why hurry to download such minor changes and possibly (the key word here) mess up your system.
Why not mess around with the kanotix distro to see various changes? I've done a little bit, knowing I'm safe leaving my Mepis 3.3 well alone.
Edit: See this official announcement here:
http://www.mepis.org/node/6500
Are you are suspicious that there will be problems upgrading from 3.3 to 3.4?
Last edited by anticapitalista; 06-12-2005 at 05:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 05:58 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 115
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by anticapitalista
Are you are suspicious that there will be problems upgrading from 3.3 to 3.4? [/B]
|
I expect, as you say, that 3.4 will be a major change... with the incorporation of a new KDE and a new X server. Thus, I expect the best thing will be a fresh install. For those with a plain desktop system and who can preserve their home dir, its not a big deal. But several of my boxen are development machines where I run a local apache and mysql with a bunch of DBs.... meaning they all have to be re-installed etc.
This much I know. I won't be the first guy to move from 3.3.x to 3.4.x. I'll let some of you folks be the pioneers. Besides I tried the Kanotix CD with KDE 3.4 and I didn't see anything in there that I want or need or must have.
Al
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005, 07:32 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: salem county , New Jersey
Distribution: PCLinuxOS .92
Posts: 59
Rep:
|
In my case i did a clean install of 3.3.1, no big deal. There really is no compelling reason to upgrade, i just did it for something to do one
evening.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|