MandrivaThis Forum is for the discussion of Mandriva (Mandrake) Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I use MDK 10.1 and there are really ugly fonts. I found some tutorial how to fix it ( convexhull.com/mandrake_fonts.html ). But when I installed FreeType, nothing had been changed. Windows fonts like Verdana reallz do not look like thez do in Windows.
I also couldn't do this:
"
Now go to the file include/freetype/config/ftoption.h and look for the line
/* #define TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER */
Go ahead and uncomment it:
#define TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER
"
because I didn't find that line in the file ftoption.h
I also couldn't do this: " Now go to the file include/freetype/config/ftoption.h and look for the line /* #define TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER */ Go ahead and uncomment it: #define TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER " because I didn't find that line in the file ftoption.h
That's kind of the whole deal there chief. It's there, trust me.
Follow the links in my sig. It may be helpful to you.
Well, you'll right, it was there, I looked up in the wrong file.
But no improvement has come after I installed it again.
BTW: this I get while configuring and making:
[root@localhost freetype-2.1.9]# ./configure --prefix=/usronfigure --prefix=/usr
..
make: Nothing to be done for `unix'.
[root@localhost freetype-2.1.9]# make
make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
[root@localhost freetype-2.1.9]# ./configure --prefix=/usronfigure --prefix=/usr
..
make: Nothing to be done for `unix'.
[root@localhost freetype-2.1.9]# make
make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
Besides what I hope are typos, the issue is that you have allready configured the package. The easiest solution is to delete the directory, extract the tar again, edit the file to enable the bytecode interpreter, then run ./configure --prefix=/usr again. That should do it for you.
Another hint: Save the freetype-2.1.9 directory you successfully compiled in. If/when you upgrade X in the future, it may overwite your libs and make things ugly again. If you have the directory, all you have to do is run "make install" from within it and everything will be fixed.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.