LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Mandriva
User Name
Password
Mandriva This Forum is for the discussion of Mandriva (Mandrake) Linux.

Notices


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 08-22-2011, 11:40 AM   #1
Wayne Sallee
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Distribution: The one that I built. (lfs)
Posts: 269

Rep: Reputation: 17
Anyone using Linux 3.0 on Mandriva?


This thread is now closed, but not solved.
This thread is now closed, but not solved.
This thread is now closed, but not solved.
This thread is now closed, but not solved.
This thread is now closed, but not solved.
This thread is now closed, but not solved.
This thread is now closed, but not solved.
This thread is now closed, but not solved.
This thread is now closed, but not solved.

Last edited by Wayne Sallee; 08-30-2011 at 01:00 PM.
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 08-23-2011, 08:49 AM   #2
Wayne Sallee
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Distribution: The one that I built. (lfs)
Posts: 269

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Looks like someone tried to post to this thread 5 hours ago, but forgot to press "post reply".

Wayne Sallee
Wayne@WayneSallee.com
 
Old 08-23-2011, 10:15 AM   #3
Nylex
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,464

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
How do you determine that? Note that threads are automatically bumped if they've not had any replies after 24 or 48 hours. By responding to your thread, you've stopped that from happening.

It might help if you told us which modules weren't working. If they're not part of the kernel (i.e. you've obtained them from elsewhere), do you have the source? You should be able to rebuild them in that case.

Also, there's no need to put your email address in your posts. The information on LQ is meant to be public and asking others to email you their responses stops others benefiting. Also, by posting your email address, you're probably going to end up with more spam.
 
Old 08-23-2011, 01:19 PM   #4
Wayne Sallee
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Distribution: The one that I built. (lfs)
Posts: 269

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nylex View Post
How do you determine that?
Because the forum software was stuck on thinking that someone had posted at that time, but would not clear the "unread post" status when read and the page reloaded, but posting cleared it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nylex View Post
Note that threads are automatically bumped if they've not had any replies after 24 or 48 hours. By responding to your thread, you've stopped that from happening.
That does not seem like a very good practice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nylex View Post

It might help if you told us which modules weren't working. If they're not part of the kernel (i.e. you've obtained them from elsewhere), do you have the source? You should be able to rebuild them in that case.
The modules that are not working are fglrx and vboxdrver(sp), and a wifi driver that I was not using, so I just uninstantiated it. I installed the source from kernel.org pure kernel. Is that what you are talking abut? How do I rebuild them? I think I did that when I installed the kernel, or is there some other kind of rebuild that you are talking about?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nylex View Post
Also, there's no need to put your email address in your posts. The information on LQ is meant to be public and asking others to email you their responses stops others benefiting. Also, by posting your email address, you're probably going to end up with more spam.
I get a couple hundred e-mails a day. I'm not scared of spam.

Wayne Sallee
Wayne@WayneSallee.com
 
Old 08-23-2011, 02:15 PM   #5
Nylex
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,464

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
The 24 and 48 hour bumping is a good thing, because it means threads with no replies are made noticeable. However, I digress..

fglrx, as far as I know is a proprietary module that's distributed in binary form only. As such, you won't be able to rebuild it and will have to take up the problem with the developers. Check this, though.

I've never attempted to build the VirtualBox modules myself, but the source is available. I don't know whether it's possible to build just the modules, or you have to build the entire package, however. I'd advise checking their documentation.
 
Old 08-27-2011, 09:11 AM   #6
Wayne Sallee
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Distribution: The one that I built. (lfs)
Posts: 269

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
I tried installing an older kernel, and get the same results, so it has nothing to do with the kernel version.

I've started a new thread at:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...52#post4454852
so ignore this thread.

Wayne Sallee
Wayne@WayneSallee.com
 
0 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-27-2011, 05:43 PM   #7
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne Sallee View Post
Because the forum software was stuck on thinking that someone had posted at that time, but would not clear the "unread post" status when read and the page reloaded, but posting cleared it. That does not seem like a very good practice.
Why would someone editing the quick reply box (and not posting anything) mark the thread as unread? That makes no sense.

The real reason is that the system that tells whether a thread is unread is really glitchy.
 
Old 09-01-2011, 02:49 PM   #8
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
Since you took it upon yourself to vandalise this thread, I have closed it. Incidentally, dumping your email at the end of your post makes it frighteningly trivial for mail harvesters to make you their best friend.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
  


Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Upgrading to 64bit Mandriva Linux from 32bit Mandriva 2010.1 Linux j4m35 Linux - Distributions 1 01-16-2011 02:36 PM
MANDRIVA 2008 /Mandriva Linux Control Center metallica1973 Linux - Wireless Networking 2 04-09-2008 09:02 PM
LXer: Mandriva releases Mandriva Linux 2007 Spring LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-18-2007 11:16 PM
LXer: Mandriva and HP launch new computers pre-loaded with Mandriva Linux 2006 in 37 Countries in Latin America LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-18-2006 10:01 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Mandriva

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration