LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Mageia
User Name
Password
Mageia This forum is for the discussion of Mageia Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-21-2013, 04:50 PM   #1
Timothy Miller
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian Jessie, OpenSuse 13.1, Chakra.
Posts: 665

Rep: Reputation: 95
Is there a Mageia repository that includes a modern Firefox?


So getting tired of not having the new features of Firefox 20 now that I'm getting used to them from every other OS I have. Is there a way other than a manual installation that I can get a modern version of Firefox and have it kept updated?
 
Old 04-21-2013, 06:42 PM   #2
VoodooDali
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Distribution: Mageia
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 3
Starting in Mageia 3, the "firefox-aurora" package in the Core repository should give you the latest stable release (currently 20).

The "firefox-beta" package will let you in on version 21. hope it helps.
 
Old 04-21-2013, 09:11 PM   #3
Timothy Miller
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian Jessie, OpenSuse 13.1, Chakra.
Posts: 665

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 95
Yes it does, since I'm getting ready to upgrade to 3 sometime this week. Just need to find the time to set down and run the upgrade. Thanks!
 
Old 04-30-2013, 11:07 PM   #4
digigold
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2012
Location: Northern US
Distribution: Mageia, RHEL, CentOS & Scientific Linux
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 7
FWIW, I've had the best luck using the firefox-beta release channel in Cauldron. I believe VoodooDali may be mistaken, as Aurora has been the alpha release channel as far back as I can remembe. It is currently at v22.

So as of today (May 1st, 2013), the firefox release channels contain the following:
Stabile: v20
Beta: v21
Aurora (Alpha): v22
 
Old 05-01-2013, 10:48 AM   #5
VoodooDali
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Distribution: Mageia
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 3
I might have had that wrong; sorry. However, at the time of the initial writing, the "aurora" package in Mageia's repositories was using Firefox v. 20, and the "beta" package was using FF v. 21, while the simply "firefox" package was using the Extended Service Revision of FF v. 17.
 
Old 05-01-2013, 01:36 PM   #6
VoodooDali
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Distribution: Mageia
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 3
(May be some disparity in the naming conventions, between the FF releases and the Mageia repositories. Hm.) :/
 
Old 05-02-2013, 11:00 PM   #7
digigold
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2012
Location: Northern US
Distribution: Mageia, RHEL, CentOS & Scientific Linux
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoodooDali View Post
...the simply "firefox" package was using the Extended Service Revision of FF v. 17.
Unless your rolling FF out in a comercial environment, I would stay clear of the ESR release channel. I am not at all a fan.
 
Old 05-03-2013, 10:59 PM   #8
Timothy Miller
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian Jessie, OpenSuse 13.1, Chakra.
Posts: 665

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 95
Ok, so got Mageia 3 rc installed. Firefox 17.0.5 is still the default. So...I tried firefox-aurora, and it gave me a choice of installing the BETA version even though it was listed as version 20. I just want to install a non-archaic released version of Firefox but don't want BETA versions...is there any way to do this without a manual installation? Or is Mageia just not going to be something I can use as an every day system?

Last edited by Timothy Miller; 05-03-2013 at 11:01 PM.
 
Old 05-04-2013, 01:02 AM   #9
Timothy Miller
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian Jessie, OpenSuse 13.1, Chakra.
Posts: 665

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 95
Ok, installed firefox-aurora. It's not Firefox current. It's the ALPHA release of current (20.0a2 at this moment), and so doesn't work with many plugins. So my original question still unfortunately stands. Is there any way to get a repository that has the CURRENT, RELEASE version of Firefox, not an alpha, beta, or a moldy oldy?
 
Old 05-04-2013, 10:35 AM   #10
VoodooDali
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Distribution: Mageia
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 3
I'll ask around and see what I can find, but it may be difficult to get answers this weekend as the Mageia servers are undergoing maintenance.

I'm sorry to have given you a bum steer, and I want to make this right for you.
 
Old 05-04-2013, 10:49 AM   #11
Timothy Miller
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian Jessie, OpenSuse 13.1, Chakra.
Posts: 665

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 95
I'm not opposed to adding 3rd party repos, I just want a stable version of my personal favorite browser. I really like Mageia, but honestly, not having my personal favorite browser with a current version without doing a manual install is to me a deal-breaker. I know it sounds whiny, but I choose distros based on small things like that. WHy I love Debian as my main repo. Add Liquorix sources (modern kernels), add experimental repos (modern firefox and thunderbird), add deb-multimedia repos (modern multimedia programs), and it's awesome. Mageia seems to make a lot of that more simple since it's got modern stuff in MOST of the repos, but the whole defaults to an archaic browser with no ability to get a stable modern browser is a killer to me.

That and for whatever reason if aurora WAS the stable version, it also for some odd reason depends on the firefox-beta version, which I have no desire to have installed. Not sure why the devs decided to reuquire the beta for it, that simply makes no sense.
 
Old 05-04-2013, 10:58 AM   #12
snowpine
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,915

Rep: Reputation: 1046Reputation: 1046Reputation: 1046Reputation: 1046Reputation: 1046Reputation: 1046Reputation: 1046Reputation: 1046
Here is the magical website where you can always find the latest Firefox: http://firefox.com

FF 17 was released less than 6 months ago and is 100% fully currently supported. If that's your definition of "archaic" then what does that make me?

I'll never understand the mentality that not having everything spoon-fed would be a "deal-breaker." That's a very "Windows way" of thinking about things, IMHO. Open source means empowering the user to be in control of their system!
 
Old 05-04-2013, 11:26 AM   #13
Timothy Miller
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian Jessie, OpenSuse 13.1, Chakra.
Posts: 665

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 95
Yes, and IMO, I'd rather use a distro that has a REPOSITORY with the latest version of something is better than installing manually. It's not spoon fed, I'm simply asking if there is a repository somewhere. If there isn't, I'll simply move on and put Mageia on my list of "decent OS, but too much work for my tastes to have it working the way I want". If I wanted to install everything manually, I'd run LFS. There's a reason I run only distros that have good package managers, and good repositories available. I don't WANT to do everything manually, that's one of the reasons to NOT run windows.

So no, wanting an os that has a repository that has the software in it that I want to use is most definitely a linux way of thinking about things. The Windows way is manually installing anything that isn't available preinstalled. On of my primary reasons after being open source for running linux is having an up to date OS. There's a reason I don't care for RHEL, or CentOS, or Debian "stable". The software is simply old. I like latest and greatest STABLE versions of software. Having a 4 version old browser isn't up to date to me. It's archaic.
 
Old 05-04-2013, 12:37 PM   #14
VoodooDali
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Distribution: Mageia
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 3
Well, snowpine beat me to the answer, but indeed it turns out the way to get the latest non-beta FF is to manually install. very sorry for the incorrect info I gave out at first.

That being said, I am having a very good run with the v.21 beta...
 
Old 05-04-2013, 01:09 PM   #15
Timothy Miller
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian Jessie, OpenSuse 13.1, Chakra.
Posts: 665

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 95
Bummer, I liked Mageia other than that. Thanks for the clarification that noone has created a 3rd party repo.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Mageia 1 Support Terminated, Upgrade to Mageia 2 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-02-2012 08:00 AM
[SOLVED] Can't Boot Mageia 2 after Upgrading from Mageia 1 gdawg Mageia 3 06-24-2012 10:20 AM
LXer: Open Source: Mageia 1 to Mageia 2 Upgrade LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-22-2012 04:30 PM
LXer: Mozilla's "modern browser" attack on IE overlooks Firefox shortcomings LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-18-2011 08:20 PM
LXer: Top Vulnerable Apps List Includes Sun JRE, Firefox & Skype LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-23-2006 01:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration